The answer is 200%.
If we see the world population index and compare the population
in 1960 and 2000, we see that population in 2000 is double than 1960.
World population in 1960 = 3,007,751
World population in 2000 = <span>6,104,538 which is approximately double than 1960.</span>
So when
we express it as percentage multiply 2 with 100 and we get the percentage 200.
Answer:
c. Must have a good faith belief that the tax return position has a realistic possibility of success if challenged by the IRS
Explanation:
Statement on Standards for Tax Services No. 1 establishes as a basic principle of providing tax services that the CPA
we know that
Giving assessment administrations is on the standard premise that it has a decent confidence conviction that the government form position can be supported whenever tested
therefore
option c is correct
c. Must have a good faith belief that the tax return position has a realistic possibility of success if challenged by the IRS
Answer:
acquisition
Merger
Explanation:
Acquisition is when a company purchases almost all the shares of another company in order to have full control over it. For companies that are distressed or are not able to operate as a going concern, such can put up the company for sale.
In acquisition, the buying company oftentimes retain its name which is already a brand , work and build on the strength of the old company in order to achieve returns. Companies acquire other companies in order to have large market shares and also to diversify their business operation.
One of the benefit of acquisition is that it gives room for fresh ideas due to coming together of different people and also brings people that are experts in their various fields.
Merger is when two or more firms comes together to form a single entity.
Companies or firm merge in order to form an alliance and also send strong signals to other competitors.
Firms also merge in order to increase their financial capacity. This will enable them to be able to finance their business operations. They are also able to increase their asset base as a result of the merger.
To combat this stereotyping the HR director has decided to<u> "adopt more transparent practices".</u>
Nowadays, pay transparency is an interesting issue among HR and compensation experts. Pay transparency doesn't need to be a win or bust approach where everybody knows every other person's compensation. Or maybe, we trust transparency is a range. It's how much an association will examine its general pay rehearses. Pay transparency is significantly something other than the dollar sum a business pays every worker. It's additionally being more open about how pay was resolved and giving a clarification of the organization's compensation grades.