Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
It is convenient to let technology help out. Some graphing calculators will accommodate a model of your choice. Others are restricted to particular models, of which yours may not be one.
A spreadsheet solver may also offer the ability to optimize two variables at once. For that, you would write a function that gives the sum of the squares of the differences between your data points and those predicted by the model. You would ask the solver to minimize that sum.
If you want to do this "the old-fashioned way," you would write the same "sum of squares" function and differentiate it with respect to m and b. Solve the simultaneous equations that make those derivatives zero. (My solver finds multiple solutions, so the neighborhood needs to be restricted in some way. For example m > 0, b > 0, or sum of squares < 1.)
Answer:
7
Step-by-step explanation:
form a proportion
12/2=42/x
cross multiply
12x=84
x=7
The answer is A. Here's how you get it. Law of cosines here looks like this:
17^2 = 22^2 + 30^3 - [2(22)(30)cosA]; which simplifies to 289=484+900-1320(cosA). Doing that math gives you 289 = 1384 - 1320(cosA), and -1095 = -1320(cosA). Divide both sides by -1320 to get
.829545 = cos A. Now use the inverse cosine on your calculator to get the missing angle measure.
1.5:6 mabye? im not shure but 2 doesnt go into 9
Well he would only be able to get 3 trails at the max. I tried adding lots od different paths together and they all went over 180 degrees if there was more than 3 some went over when there was less then 3. So at the max he could fit 3 trails.