This really depends on your beliefs in if gender discrimination is as big of a deal as racial discrimination. The 14th amendment is the Equal Protection Clause, it was mainly for the slaves that had been freed in the U.S after the civil war. It basically forbids the states to restrict basic rights of citizens without going through the process of law or being protected by the law. But has recently been used in cases to of gender discrimination.
I believe it is perfectly justified for the 14th amendment to be acted in cases of gender discrimination. The 14th amendment does not have to be dedicated completely to race, but can have multiple purposes and be dedicated to gender discrimination as well. Because the 14th amendment does not mention race in its context, but mentions that basic rights shall not be stripped from citizens.
Answer: true
Explanation:
True, because they described why they were breaking away from Great Britain, and all the unfairness they had went through. They described how they felt in the unfairness, and therefore, they were breaking away from Britain.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
human resources is very essential in an organization, the training of workers, getting new employee, termination of employee's appointment as well as maintaining the organization policy as well as maintaince of business culture can be attributed to the Human resources department. On the other hand, Strategic role in organization helps in strategic planning, develop the plan and acquire enough information to keep the organization abreast of her compititors.
It should be noted that in the time past, human resources played more of all these administrative role as opposed to a strategic in the organization.
.
Answer:
To an important extent it is true that World War II was motivated by revenge, at least in Europe.
Explanation:
Germany, the main country that caused the war, had lost World War I just two decades earlier, and that loss meant the annexation of several of its former lands by neighboring countries, and the imposition of very expensive war reparation payments, that led to many economic problems in the country.
Many Germans were angry at their situation, and Hitler took advantage of this to sell the idea of revenge, but also of outright destruction.
The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
