The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
Answer: Modeling
Explanation: Alex is modeling the behavior of others on the dining table to know the right flatware to use because he isn't sure of the correct one to use.
Modeling someone's behavior means to observe their behavior and trying to imitate them.
Answer:
$606,375
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of cash payments to stockholders is shown below:
= Beginning dividend payable + cash dividend declared - ending dividend payable
= $167,625 + $585,000 - $146,250
= $606,375
We simply added the dividend declared amount and deducted the ending dividend payable to the beginning dividend payable so that the accurate amount can come.
Answer:
(D) order taker.
Explanation:
An order taker is a salesperson who collects orders checks inventories, processes straight rebuys, sets up displays but does not make any effort to invite new customers or persuade the existing ones to increase their quantities of purchase.
