<span>(10,287.56 - 10,005.23) / 10,287.56 =
(282.33) / 10,287.56 = 0.0274
0.0274/100 = 2.74%
</span><span>At the beginning of the day, the dow jones index was at $10,287.56. at the end of the day, the dow jones index was at $10,005.23. </span>The rate of change of the dow jones on this particular day is 2.74%
Downsizing is the reduction of employees in a company's payroll. It involves the elimination of some positions and thus reducing the operational cost of the company. The given statement "Downsizing describes the practice of companies shifting their production overseas" is false. Downsizing does not<span> describe the practice of companies shifting their production overseas</span>
If the Fed mailed everyone a $1,000, the effect would be a <u>rise in prices, </u>output, and income.
<h3 /><h3>What happens when money is injected into the economy?</h3>
The Equation of exchange is:
<em>Money supply x Velocity of money = Price level x Quantity of goods and services produced </em>
If the Money supply increases like it will when $1,000 is sent by the Fed to people, the velocity will also rise as people purchase more goods and services.
The Price level and the Quantity produced on the right side of the equation would also have to rise to match the left side. So prices would rise, and so would output.
Find out more on the equation of exchange at brainly.com/question/10110078.
#SPJ1
The statement that must be true about the demand for a product if it is inelastic is that, a price increase does not have a significant impact on buying habits. The correct answer would be option B. When the demand is inelastic, this situation means that the demand for a product does not decrease nor increase in corresponds to the rise or fall of its price.
Answer:
c. The medical center will prevail based upon the written contract
Explanation:
Since they later signed a written contract where it is stated in paper and has their signature that the medical center could not assure nor take any responsibilities for the birth of a kid without any medical, mental or physical defects the medical center has the upperhand on the court, as well as they did in Scalisi et al. v. New York University Medical Center that promised a perfect designed baby, the Scalsi decided for invitro fertilization because of the wife´s family medical history and tendency to autism, and they ended up with a baby with autism, so they sue the New York University Medical center, but the court sided with the NYUMC because of the written contract where it stated that they couldn´t assure the baby to be born without any medica, mental or physical defects.