Answer:
This is an example of increasing protectionism.
Explanation:
Protectionism can be defined as an economic policy under which the government of a country limits imports in order to protect the domestic economy. The government adopts a number of actions to protect domestic industries. Some of these measures are
- Tariffs
- Quotas
- Subsidies
- Product standards
In the given example, the imposition of a 35% tariff on the imports of tires from China indicates increasing protectionism. This tariff will increase the price of Chinese tires in the US market. As a result, the buyers will prefer the domestic tires which will be cheaper.
This will help the tire manufacturing industry by increasing its demand. So their production and employment will increase as well.
Answer:
In conclusion we can say that if we want to run a creative activity in the classroom, we need to check for the presence of these four features: imagination, purpose, originality and value, and organise the process in a way that all these can be incorporated.
Answer: a) 1
b) yes marginal rate of substitution is less than the relative price
c) 2.00
Explanation:
a) Raul’s marginal rate of substitution is 1 because he is only willing to trade 1 cal card for 1 additional Nolan card
b) Raul’s marginal rate of substitution is Mc/Mn = 1 However, the relative price of a Cal Ripken card is Pc/Pn = $24/$12 = 2.00. Since the marginal rate of substitution is less than the relative price, Raul can make himself better off by selling 1 Cal card and buying Nolan cards.
c) His marginal rate of substitution must be equal to the relative price; the relative price rule holds that says that Mc/Mn = Pc/Pn. From b above we know that the relative price is 2.00, Raul's marginal rate of substitution must also be 2.00.
Answer: Yes, because the ETF is worth more than his original investment
Explanation:
From the information given in the question, the average inflation for next 20 years = 3.50%
Amount invested by John = $25,000
Then, the amount in 20 years after the adjustment of inflation will be:
= Amount invested (1+inflation rate)^n
= 25000(1+0.035)^20
= 25000(1.035)^20
= 25000 × 1.9898
= $49745
In this case, the answer is Yes due to the fact that the ETF is worth more than his original investment.
Answer:
d. is in the short run
Explanation:
In the short run, at least one factor of production is fixed. In this question, the kitchen area and sitting space are fixed. These represents the fixed costs.
In the long run, all factors of production are variable.
The variable cost in this question , is the cost of Labour.
I hope my answer helps you
