The appropriate response is The Magna Carta. It guaranteed the insurance of chapel rights, assurance for the noblemen from unlawful detainment, access to quick equity, and constraints on medieval installments to the Crown, to be actualized through a committee of 25 aristocrats.
The cause of the Scopes Trial was disagreement about evolution.
One side thought that evolution should be taught in schools, while another side
said that it shouldn’t. It was also said that teaching of evolution was in
violation of Tennessee’s Butler Act which stated that it was unlawful to teach evolution
in any state-funded school.
It was purposely meant to also bring publicity, but in the
end, John Scopes was fined $100 dollars which is equivalent to over $1000
dollars today. Many of the people and reporters went to the “big-shot” lawyers involved
in the case so, the lawyers to morph the truth into anything they wished and
the public hung on to their words. One thing it teaches is that we need to look
at both sides because one side could be changed to what someone wants.
I would not because it seems dry down there
The answer would be "True". :)
Answer:
external threats; militants
Explanation:
Militarism is defined as the strengthening of the military of ones country by giving more control and and authority to them. Also by involving and inducting large number of people to work together for a common goal.
It is believed that having a large and a strong military could influence others and also helps in protecting ones country from any foreign or external wars and threats. It also helps in protecting the country and its people that they are suffering from any civil war or any militancy disturbances.
