1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuri [45]
3 years ago
7

Udging from both the map and the quotation on this page, why was Mecca a trade center for the Arabian Peninsula?

History
1 answer:
Verizon [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Because Mecca is in a strategic geographical location, in the middle of the West Coast of the Arab Peninsula, which has been a trading area since antiquity.

This is because the populations of the Arab Peninsula were nomadic and semi-nomadic until a few centuries ago, due to the harsh desert climate, and the lack of fertile to soil to make sedentary life possible.

In Mecca, several trade routes met, not only from the Arabian Peninsula, but also from East Africa, which were connected to the Peninsula either through the Sinai or through the Red Sea.

You might be interested in
What event finally caused president wilson to ask for the declaration of war against germany?
CaHeK987 [17]

The event that finally caused to ask Woodrow Wilson for the declaration of war against Germany was the announcement of a policy of unrestricted submarine warfare by Germany on February 1, 1917, and the sinking of the American cargo ship Housatonic on February 3, despite their previous promises of leaving American ships alone.

By that time Wilson had already decided to break relationships with Germany, and such decision was reaffirmed when, days later, the U.S. received the Zimmermann Telegram, a secret message decoded by Britain, in which the German foreign secretary Arthur Zimmermann proposed Mexico an alliance in the case of war between the U.S. and Germany, promising Mexico financial and territorial rewards for its support.  


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did military training camps become new “melting pots” for America in world war II?
vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

The fourteenth amendment how did the action resolve a longstanding conflict in post-civil war America? it defined the process for readmittance of the former confederate states into the united states of America. it ensured the right to vote to all male citizens of the united states, regardless of race, color, or prior servitude. it defined citizenship and related rights for African Americans. it abolished slavery in the united states.

Explanation:

This is all I know.

Hope it helps~

<h2><em>Good luck with your work!!!~ (❁´◡`❁)</em></h2>
6 0
3 years ago
What did Lincoln do to provoke war?
Reptile [31]
Southern leaders of the Civil War period placed the blame for the outbreak of fighting squarely on Lincoln<span>. They accused the President of acting aggressively towards the South and of deliberately provoking war in order to overthrow the Confederacy. For its part, the Confederacy sought a peaceable accommodation of its legitimate claims to independence, and resorted to measures of self-defence only when threatened by Lincoln's coercive policy. Thus, Confederate vice president, Alexander H. Stephens, claimed that the war was "inaugurated by Mr. Lincoln." Stephens readily acknowledged that General </span>Beauregard's troops fired the "first gun." But, he argued, the larger truth is that "in personal or national conflicts, it is not he who strikes the first blow, or fires the first gun that inaugurates or begins the conflict." Rather, the true aggressor is "the first who renders force necessary."

Stephens identified the beginning of the war as Lincoln's order sending a "hostile fleet, styled the 'Relief Squadron'," to reinforce Fort Sumter. "The war was then and there inaugurated and begun by the authorities at Washington. General Beauregard did not open fire upon Fort Sumter until this fleet was, to his knowledge, very near the harbor of Charleston, and until he had inquired of Major Anderson . . . whether he would engage to take no part in the expected blow, then coming down upon him from the approaching fleet . . . When Major Anderson . . .would make no such promise, it became necessary for General Beauregard to strike the first blow, as he did; otherwise the forces under his command might have been exposed to two fires at the same time-- one in front, and the other in the rear." The use of force by the Confederacy , therefore, was in "self-defence," rendered necessary by the actions of the other side.

Jefferson Davis, who, like Stephens, wrote his account after the Civil War, took a similar position. Fort Sumter was rightfully South Carolina's property after secession, and the Confederate government had shown great "forbearance" in trying to reach an equitable settlement with the federal government. But the Lincoln administration destroyed these efforts by sending "a hostile fleet" to Sumter. "The attempt to represent us as the aggressors," Davis argued, "is as unfounded as the complaint made by the wolf against the lamb in the familiar fable. He who makes the assault is not necessarily he that strikes the first blow or fires the first gun."

From Davis's point of view, to permit the strengthening of Sumter, even if done in a peaceable manner, was unacceptable. It meant the continued presence of a hostile threat to Charleston. Further, although the ostensible purpose of the expedition was to resupply, not reinforce the fort, the Confederacy had no guarantee that Lincoln would abide by his word. And even if he restricted his actions to resupply in this case, what was to prevent him from attempting to reinforce the fort in the future? Thus, the attack on Sumter was a measure of "defense." To have acquiesced in the fort's relief, even at the risk of firing the first shot, "would have been as unwise as it would be to hesitate to strike down the arm of the assailant, who levels a deadly weapon at one's breast, until he has actually fired."

In the twentieth century, this critical view of Lincoln's actions gained a wide audience through the writings of Charles W. Ramsdell and others. According to Ramsdell, the situation at Sumter presented Lincoln with a series of dilemmas. If he took action to maintain the fort, he would lose the border South and a large segment of northern opinion which wanted to conciliate the South. If he abandoned the fort, he jeopardized the Union by legitimizing the Confederacy. Lincoln also hazarded losing the support of a substantial portion of his own Republican Party, and risked appearing a weak and ineffective leader.

Lincoln could escape these predicaments, however, if he could induce southerners to attack Sumter, "to assume the aggressive and thus put themselves in the wrong in the eyes of the North and of the world." By sending a relief expedition, ostensibly to provide bread to a hungry garrison, Lincoln turned the tables on the Confederates, forcing them to choose whether to permit the fort to be strengthened, or to act as the aggressor. By this "astute strategy," Lincoln maneuvered the South into firing the first shot.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was not a common reason for Jewish migration in the Middle Ages?
klasskru [66]
C. conquering jerusalem
8 0
4 years ago
What are three differences between medieval and renaissance art?
FromTheMoon [43]

Three differences between medieval and renaissance art were that most of    medieval art was more allegorical and linked to the divine world and its possibilities towards humanity. Medieval art was also often concerned to represent heavenly and apocalyptic sceneries. Their paintings were flat, with little sense of depth.

The Renaissance art focused more attention to the human body and detail. They taught through the realistic perspective, shading, lighting, and proportions. Renaissance art celebrated man's intelligence to build and construct and to be the cause for a possibly good life.

I hope this was enough.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • First Amendment
    7·1 answer
  • What were Japan's reasons for bombing Pearl Harbor? What was the American's response?
    10·1 answer
  • Which best describes a purpose of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1860s and 1870s? a) to intimidate blacks and white Republicans b) to m
    6·2 answers
  • What do Rome in the US have in common​
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the
    10·1 answer
  • Question 2
    13·2 answers
  • Common feature of Muslim architecture
    10·2 answers
  • State two problems faced by cities in the united states in the late 1800s
    7·2 answers
  • Write a report analyzing the Articles of Confederation
    10·2 answers
  • How are yall so smart
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!