Answer: Winfield Scott I think
Explanation:
Its a multilateral system of trading in which a country pays for its imports from one country by its exports to another. Hope this answers your question :)
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Answer:
This is an example of D. Visual encoding.
Explanation:
Our brain encodes all types of information in order to be able to store it for future use.
Visual encoding refers to the encoding of images and any visual into the brain. By doing so, the individual is able to remember visuals.
In this case, Felipe has encoded the type of font from his presentation; bold and italic and is able to tell which is which and remembering what it looks like by taking a glimpse at his work and noticing the differences which is possible thanks to his visual encoding.
