1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fomenos
3 years ago
10

India will fall back quite rapidly through the centuries into the barbarism and privations of the Middle Ages. Winston Churchill

Based on this quotation from Winston Churchill , how did the British feel about the people of India during the years of British rule in India ? -0 A Britain needed to control India for the safety of the rest of the world . B ) India would return to a period when it was a powerful empire of its own . India would not be able to govern itself in the modern world without the British The British would be better off without dealing with problems in a India D. the british would be better off without dealing with problems in barbaric india
History
1 answer:
Ivan3 years ago
3 0

Answer: India would not be able to govern itself in the modern world without the British.

Explanation:

The British ruled India for the better part of a century and during that time, India was their most populated and important colony and they made sure to rule it as actively as they could which is why when the Indians began demanding independence, there were some that did not approve.

Winston Churchill was one of those. He believed that if the British were to stop governing India, it would go back to a state of barbarism and anarchy. The British people who thought like him therefore believed that British rule in India was necessary for it to remain stable as India could not govern itself.

You might be interested in
What is a gente de razón?
snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

reasonble people thats the answer

3 0
3 years ago
Based on the ruling of Gibbons v. Ogden, who could regulate commerce between states?
Mazyrski [523]
The answer to your question is C) The federal government.
7 0
3 years ago
How is the free soil party different from the know nothing party?
umka21 [38]

Answer:

The Know-Nothing Party was established in 1850.

In July of 1844, riots broke out in the city of Philadelphia. Nativists battled Irish immigrants which resulted up to two Catholic churches and a Catholic school being burned down.

The Know-Nothing Party was was an outgrowth of the strong anti-immigrant people.

In 1843, The Know-Nothings formed the American Republic Party.

1854 they had allied themselves with groups within another political party called the Whigs.

In 1855, The Know-Nothings dropped much of their secrecy and became known as the American Party.

FREE-SOILER PARTY

The Free-Soiler Party was a short political party in the US during 1848-1852 presidential elections

It was the 3rd largest party that grew it's greatest strength from New York.

The party leadership consisted of former anti-slavery members of the Whig Party and the Democratic Party.

Its main purpose was opposing the expansion of slavery into the western territories, arguing that free men on free soil comprised a morally and economically superior system to slavery.

Its presidential nominee in 1848, Martin Van Buren, received 291,616 votes against Zachary Taylor of the Whigs and Lewis Cass of the Democrats, but Van Buren received no electoral votes. The Party's "spoiler" effect in 1848 may have put Zachary Taylor into office in a narrowly-contested election.

The Compromise of 1850 temporarily neutralized the issue of slavery and undercut the party's no-compromise position. Most Barnburners returned to the Democratic party, and the Free Soil Party became dominated by ardent anti-slavery leaders.

The Free Soil Party was a notable third party. More successful than most, it sent two Senators and fourteen Representatives to the thirty-first Congress, which convened from March 4, 1849 to March 3, 1851.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help !!! Urgent! Please.
NNADVOKAT [17]
I think that i got the answer for number (30) and i think that the answer is (c) because it's George Washington and James Madison. 
                                
                        hope it help
  <span />
8 0
3 years ago
Match the following words with their meaning.
alina1380 [7]
Jiskha help me with something similar
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Briefly describe ONE major difference between Nash’s and Maier’s historical interpretations of the origins of the American Revol
    6·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST 10 POINTS
    9·2 answers
  • To achieve a victory in Europe, the Allies needed to create an effective
    5·2 answers
  • Violence was common in Sumerian society. How does the character of Gilgamesh suggest that Sumerian society could be violent?
    12·2 answers
  • Find the value of this expression if x = -7.<br> X2 +7/x<br> Enter the correct answer.
    14·1 answer
  • The U.S. Constitution privileged slave owners in all the following ways except A. Protecting the slave trade for at least 20 yea
    5·1 answer
  • The return of the monarchy in England in 1660 is known as the ____________
    7·2 answers
  • 3. Which answer is the term for a fracture in the Earth's crust? *
    14·1 answer
  • The Lieutenant Governor's job is closest to what job at the federal level?
    12·2 answers
  • Can someone answer this about Japan, will give the brainliest to those who give the best answer
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!