You can find a unit rate when given a rate by dividing the the second number in the rate (if you had 3:4, you would divide 4) by the same number. (in the problem I gave you, you would divide 4 by 4 to get 1 then divide 3 by 4.) Then you would have the unit rate. Sorry if that didn't make any sense.
$49.50 the jacket costs this because her total amount was $66. to find total money I said 3/4x - 1/4x = $33 so 1/2x =$33 and x= $66. then multiply the total by 3/4 to get $49.50
Answer:
Linear
Step-by-step explanation:
The balances each go up by $110
300 + 110 = 410
410 + 110 = 520
520 + 110 = 630
Answer:
8.5
Step-by-step explanation:
When you write out the data set, it looks like this:
5, 8, 8, 8, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10, 10
The median means the exact middle of the data set. In this case, it falls between the 8 and the 9, so the middle would be 8.5, so that's the median of the set. I hope this helps :)
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
