Answer:
The answer is "$ 140".
Explanation:
The company produces the quantity MR = MC and if there is no quantity MR = MC, the amount throughout the case MR is just greater and closest to MC to maximize profit. 
Here MR = marginal income and marginal cost =MC 
MR =
In the above table, we could see that the amount MR = MC = 8 isn't available. Thus it produces the amount where the MR 
is only larger but nearest to MC. 
25 unit MR =
 ![= [TR (when \ Q = 25) -TR \frac{(when \ Q = 20)]}{(25 - 20)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%20%5BTR%20%28when%20%5C%20Q%20%3D%2025%29%20-TR%20%5Cfrac%7B%28when%20%5C%20Q%20%3D%2020%29%5D%7D%7B%2825%20-%2020%29%7D)

 (Minimum and superior to MC) 
MR of 30 units , similarly MR of 30 units.
, similarly MR of 30 units. 
Consequently, 25 units were produced and 12.5 units were produced. 
Currently, XYZ breaks the agreement and produces three more so thus maximum quantity produced on a market = 25 + 5 = 30 and through the above table they see which if quantity = 30, price = 16. 
XYZ produces 12.5 + 5 = 17.5 output from 30 units. 
Cost Total = TVC + TFC 
Total TVC = Total Cost for Variable TFC = Maximum Cost of TFC = 0. 
If MC is stable, TVC = MC  Q = 8
 Q = 8  q, where Q = exposed to the real produced and XYZ produces 17.5 in this case.
 q, where Q = exposed to the real produced and XYZ produces 17.5 in this case. 
Total expenditure (TC+) is TVC = TFC = 8  17.5.
 17.5. 
Take control = TR - TC = TC = 16  17.5 - 8
 17.5 - 8  17.5 = 150.
 17.5 = 150. 
So the business XYZ is profiting = 140