Answer Not claiming the instrument hes sending
Explanation:
Answer:
$90,000
Explanation:
We are assuming that the $210,000 paid for 70% of Pumpkin Corporation represents a fair value for their stock. The non-controlling interest is 30% of the company's stocks and we can use the value paid to determine the value of the non-controlling interest.
Non-controlling interest = ($210,000 / 70) * 30 = $90,000
Answer: a. Making authorized commitments
Explanation:
Executive Orders 12674 and 12731 (which amended 12674) of 1989 and 1990 respectively, were signed by President Bush with the purpose of setting forth the principles of ethical conduct that were required of Federal Government Officers and Employees.
These principles were meant to ensure that government officials and employees abstained from Abuse of power whilst working in such a way as not to bring disrepute to the Federal Government.
All of the above are violations of the Order except option A which is stated in Part I Section 101 (f) of Executive Order 12674. It reads that, "<em>Employees shall make no unauthorized statements</em>..." thus insinuating that employees are allowed to make Authorized statements.
Answer:
d. Selling Price
Explanation:
Break even point is calculated as 
Thus, break even point in units only in two cases,
- Fixed cost is reduced that is decreased,
- Contribution per unit is increased.
Now, here the options are
a. Increase in units sales volume is of no relevance as will not impact the fixed cost or contribution per unit.
b. Increase in fixed cost will result in higher break even point, as numerator in the fraction will increase.
c. Increase in unit variable cost will ultimately decrease the contribution thus, it is of no relevance.
d. Increase in selling price will increase the contribution per unit, that is the increase in denominator value in fraction, thus, break even units will decrease.
Correct option is
d. Selling Price
Answer:
D: The accept/reject decision depends on the firm's risk-adjustment policy. If Norris' policy is to increase the required return on a riskier-than average project to 3% over rs, then it should reject the project
Explanation:
Please refer the complete question:
Which of the following statements is correct?
a. The project should definitely be accepted because its expected return (before any risk adjustments) is greater than its required return.
b. The project should definitely be rejected because its expected return (before risk adjustment) is less than its required return.
c. Riskier-than-average projects should have their expected returns increased to reflect their higher risk. Clearly, this would make the project acceptable regardless of the amount of the adjustment.
d. The accept/reject decision depends on the firm's risk-adjustment policy. If Norris' policy is to increase the required return on a riskier-than-average project to 3% over rS, then it should reject the project.
e. Capital budgeting projects should be evaluated solely on the basis of their total risk. Thus, insufficient information has been provided to make the accept/reject decision.
