All categories

2 years ago

Plzz helpppppp222!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mathematics

2 answers:

Marta_Voda [28]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The rectangle has 4 corners of 90 degrees.

Here a rectangle is divided into two right triangles. In right-angled triangles, the opposite side at a 30-degree angle is half a chord...I replace x instead of length.. So x / 2 = 4--->x:8

The perimeter of a rectangle is equal to (length + width) × 2--->(8+4)×2=24m^2

love history [14]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

$\text{(D) }16\sqrt{3}\:\mathrm{m^2}$

Step-by-step explanation:

In all 30-60-90 triangles, the sides are in ratio $x:2x:x\sqrt{3}$ , where $x$ is the side opposite to the 30 degree angle and $2x$ is the hypotenuse of the triangle.

The rectangle shown forms two 30-60-90 triangles. The side labelled 4 meters is opposite to the 30 degree angle. Therefore, the side on top must be $x\sqrt{3}\text{ for }x=4$ . Let the length of the top base be $w$ :

$w=4\sqrt{3}$

The area of a rectangle with length $l$ and width $w$ is given by $A=lw$ . Thus, the area of the rectangle is:

$A=4\cdot 4\sqrt{3},\\A=\boxed{16\sqrt{3}\:\mathrm{m^2}}$

You might be interested in

Proportional relationships, please answer all of the parts! Thank you!

Natalka [10]

Answer:

a. No (see below)

b. (see below)

c. Johnny

d. Johnny = $12.50 / hour Doug = $9.16... / hour

e. Doug: extend the table to show how much he gets paid for 1 hour of work (the unit rate)

Johnny: already on the graph

Step-by-step explanation:

a. No. This is because a proportional relationship would have a certain ratio between payment and the amount of time spent working, which would not change. However, if Doug's neighbour pays him $55 for 6 hours, it's likely that this is not a proportional relationship, or we would be able to divide $55 by the 6 hours Doug spent working.

b. Even though above I said that it's probably not a proportional relationship, if it were, we would have to divide everything equally. I'm guessing the table should look like this:

Doug

Time (hr) Earnings ($)

4 $36.66...

5 $45.8333...

6 $55

7 $64.4666....

8 $73.333...

To work out how much Doug would get for working 4 hours:

4/6 x $55 = 2/3 x $55 = $36.66... (so definitely not a proportional relationship)

To work out how much Doug would get for working 5 hours:

5/6 x $55 = $45.8333.... (more evidence that this is not a proportional relationship)

To work out how much Doug would get for working 7 hours (we already got 6 hours):

7/6 x $55 = $64.4666...

To work out how much Doug would get for working 8 hours:

8/6 x $55 = $73.33... (we could double the 4 hour payment, but this is probably more accurate)

c. Johnny is getting paid more. If we look at how much Doug gets for 6 hours, it's $55. If we look out at how much Johnny gets for 6 hours, it's $75. (If we do the same with the other amounts of time, it's the same.

4 hours: D = $36.67 vs J = $50

5 hours: D = $45.83 VS J = $60

etc...

d. Johnny gets $75 per 6 hours --> 75/6 = $12.50 per hour

Doug gets $55 per 6 hours --> 55/6 = $9.1666... per hour

e. Carry on the table for Doug all the way to 1, so you can see the how much Doug gets paid for 1 hour of work (i.e. the minimum).

The unit rate is already on the graph for Johnny.

HOPE THIS HELPED :)

P.S. Mate cld you please give me Brainliest? That table took so much dam work

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If f(x) = 2x - 6 and g(x) = 3x + 9, find (f + g)(x)

alex41 [277]

Answer:

5x+3

Step-by-step explanation:

$(f + g)(x) = f(x) + g(x) \\ =2x - 6 + 3x + 9 \\ = 5x + 3$

consider marking as Brainliest if this helped

5 0

3 years ago

Pls I need the answer and explanasion

Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

=no of children who like oatmeal/toatal population*100%

=15/50*100%

=(1500/50)%

=30%

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

You are given the following sequence:

borishaifa [10]

<h2> Question No 1</h2>

Answer:

7.5 is the 4th term of the sequence $60, 30, 15, 7.5, ...$ .

In other words: $\boxed{a_4=7.5}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Considering the sequence

$60, 30, 15, 7.5, ...$

As we know that a sequence is said to be a list of numbers or objects in a special order.

$60, 30, 15, 7.5, ...$

is a sequence starting at 60 and decreasing by half each time. Here, 60 is the first term, 30 is the second term, 15 is the 3rd term and 7.5 is the fourth term.

In other words,

$a_1=60$ ,

$\:a_2=30$ ,

$a_3=15$ , and

$a_4=7.5$

Therefore, 7.5 is the 4th term of the sequence $60, 30, 15, 7.5, ...$ .

In other words: $\boxed{a_4=7.5}$

<h2> Question # 2</h2>

Answer:

The value of a subscript 5 is 16.

i.e. When n = 5, then h(5) = 16

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine:

What is the value of a subscript 5?

Information fetching and Solution Steps:

Chart with two rows.

The first row is labeled n.

The second row is labeled h of n. i.e. h(n)

The first row contains the numbers three, four, five, and six.

The second row contains the numbers four, nine, sixteen, and twenty-five.

Making the data chart

n 3 4 5 6

h(n) 4 9 16 25

As we can reference a specific term in the sequence by using the subscript. From the table, it is clear that 'n' row represents the input and and 'h(n)' represents the output.

So, when n = 5, the value of subscript 5 corresponds with 16. In other words: When n = 5, then h(5) = 16

Therefore, the value of a subscript 5 is 16.

<h2> Question # 3</h2>

Answer:

We determine that the sequence 33, 31, 28, 24, 19, … is neither arithmetic nor geometric.

Step-by-step explanation:

Considering the sequence

33, 31, 28, 24, 19, …

Lets calculate the common difference 'd' to determine if the sequence is Arithmetic or not.

$\mathrm{Compute\:the\:differences\:of\:all\:the\:adjacent\:terms}:\quad \:d=a_{n+1}-a_n$

$d = 31 - 33 = -2$

$d = 28 - 31 = -3$

$d = 24 - 28 = -4$

$d = 19 - 24 = -5$

As the common difference 'd' is not constant. It means the sequence is not Arithmetic.

Lets now calculate the common ratio 'r' to determine if the sequence is Geometric or not.

$\mathrm{Compute\:the\:ratios\:of\:all\:the\:adjacent\:terms}:\quad \:r=\frac{a_n}{a_{n-1}}$

$\frac{31}{33}=0.93939\dots ,\:\quad \frac{28}{31}=0.90322\dots ,\:\quad \frac{24}{28}=0.85714\dots ,\:\quad \frac{19}{24}=0.79166\dots$

The ratio is not constant. It means the sequence is not Geometric.

From the above analysis, we determine that the sequence 33, 31, 28, 24, 19, … is neither arithmetic nor geometric.

<h2> Question # 4</h2>

Answer:

We determine that the sequence -99, -96, -92, -87, -81... is neither arithmetic nor geometric.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the description statement:

''negative 99 comma negative 96 comma negative 92 comma negative 87 comma negative 81 comma dot dot dot''.

The statement can be translated algebraically as

-99, -96, -92, -87, -81...

Lets calculate the common difference 'd' to determine if the sequence is Arithmetic or not.

$\mathrm{Compute\:the\:differences\:of\:all\:the\:adjacent\:terms}:\quad \:d=a_{n+1}-a_n$

$-96-\left(-99\right)=3,\:\quad \:-92-\left(-96\right)=4,\:\quad \:-87-\left(-92\right)=5,\:\quad \:-81-\left(-87\right)=6$

As the common difference 'd' is not constant. It means the sequence is not Arithmetic.

Lets now calculate the common ratio 'r' to determine if the sequence is Geometric or not.

$\mathrm{Compute\:the\:ratios\:of\:all\:the\:adjacent\:terms}:\quad \:r=\frac{a_n}{a_{n-1}}$

$\frac{-96}{-99}=0.96969\dots ,\:\quad \frac{-92}{-96}=0.95833\dots ,\:\quad \frac{-87}{-92}=0.94565\dots ,\:\quad \frac{-81}{-87}=0.93103\dots$

The ratio is not constant. It means the sequence is not Geometric.

From the above analysis, we determine that the sequence -99, -96, -92, -87, -81... is neither arithmetic nor geometric.

<h2> Question # 5</h2>

Step-by-step explanation:

Considering the sequence

12, 22, 30, 36, 41, …

$\mathrm{Compute\:the\:differences\:of\:all\:the\:adjacent\:terms}:\quad \:d=a_{n+1}-a_n$

$22-12=10,\:\quad \:30-22=8,\:\quad \:36-30=6,\:\quad \:41-36=5$

As the common difference 'd' is not constant. It means the sequence is not Arithmetic.

$\mathrm{Compute\:the\:ratios\:of\:all\:the\:adjacent\:terms}:\quad \:r=\frac{a_n}{a_{n-1}}$

$\frac{22}{12}=1.83333\dots ,\:\quad \frac{30}{22}=1.36363\dots ,\:\quad \frac{36}{30}=1.2,\:\quad \frac{41}{36}=1.13888\dots$

The ratio is not constant. It means the sequence is not Geometric.

From the above analysis, we determine that the sequence 12, 22, 30, 36, 41, … is neither arithmetic nor geometric.

8 0

2 years ago

The line of symmetry of the shape is shown by a dotted line.

RSB [31]

Answer:

hard to go without a graph see explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

from each point, count har far away it is from the dotted mirror line and then count that many in the opposite direction.

for example, the spikey point at the bottom is 3 units below the mirror line so count 3 units above the mirror line and that is where other point will be

3 0

3 years ago