1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Helga [31]
3 years ago
9

Can I sue a teacher if they claim my work for themselves?

Law
1 answer:
Mademuasel [1]3 years ago
8 0
Yes that is plagiarism
You might be interested in
E. Sandi is suspected of receiving stolen goods. The police go to her house
Bingel [31]

Answer:

facts. only the officers can look through HER stuff not sandis stuff

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
El polietileno ¿Es un recurso energético?
inessss [21]
Polyethylene is used in applications ranging for films, tubes, plastic parts, laminates, etc.
3 0
3 years ago
Why is malice difficult to prove? i need this ASAP
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

Although defined within the context of a media defendant, the rule requiring proof of actual malice applies to all defendants including individuals. The standard can make it very difficult to prevail in a defamation case, even when allegations made against a public figure are unfair or are proved to be false.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment.  Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

8 0
2 years ago
WILL MARK BRAIN.LYIST Sometimes people mistakenly say that the body of a murder victim provides the corpus delicti of the crime
djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

Corpus delicti literally means the body or substance of the crime. In law the term refers to proof establishing that a crime has occurred. Testimony that a ship's passenger pushed the deceased overboard can establish the corpus delicti of murder even if the body is never recovered.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP
    14·1 answer
  • What force young children to go on streets to star live there
    15·1 answer
  • Blake worked for West Oregon Lumber Company
    9·1 answer
  • Penny is renting an apartment from Albert. Every time Penny flushes the toilet the toilet overflows and she must clean and mop t
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    9·1 answer
  • Lam qamariah in surah al mursalat * pls i need the anwers with in 2hours
    6·1 answer
  • Belva is cheated when she buys a car from Fast Eddie’s Car Mart. She attempts to return the car, but Eddie just laughs and tells
    11·1 answer
  • The boys are annoying and they make my blood boil.
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following pieces of evidence might a digital forensics expert analyze?
    9·1 answer
  • A person charged with a crime has a constitutional right to: A. receive a trial by jury . B. demand a trial in federal court . C
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!