Answer:
c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Explanation:
Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.
Electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.
<h3>
What is economic espionage?</h3>
- Economic espionage includes electronic hacking and illegal trespassing to obtain a competitor's proprietary information.
- Economic espionage is defined as the illegal or covert targeting or acquisition of sensitive financial, trade, or economic policy information; proprietary economic information; or technological information.
- Using bribery, cyber-attacks, "dumpster diving," and wiretapping.
- Creating seemingly innocent relationships with US companies in order to gather economic intelligence, including trade secrets.
- President Clinton signed the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 into law.
- It criminalizes the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets.
- It is notable for being the first federal statute to broadly define and severely punish such misappropriation and theft.
Therefore, electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.
Know more about economic espionage here:
brainly.com/question/28218496
#SPJ4
Answer:
Testimonial evidence
Explanation:
Testimonial evidence is evidence provided by people who were in the vicinity of the area where the case was located, and who, under oath, assure that they saw or heard something related to the case.
In the question, we have a typical example of testimonial evidence because a witness is assuring that he saw the defendant in the area that is related to the case, but is not necessarily providing any other type of evidence to support that claim. Whether the testimony is considered truthful or not, or relevant or not, depends on the context of the case, and on the ultimate decision of the jury.
Freedom to press can be useful as can freedom to remain silent and innocent until proven guilty they have to prove your guilty not prove your innocents
