<u>Answer:</u>
<em>(C) Gypsy will probably use a </em><u><em>pulsing</em></u><em> advertising schedule.
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
A pulsing schedule occurs when a gauge of advertising is expanded during specific periods—bodes well because of the regularity of Gypsy's the same old thing. She is continuously open and would not have any desire to quit publicizing, largely, yet might want to coordinate her promoting consumptions to the business design she watches.
A pulsing schedule joins the fighting and ceaseless booking by utilizing a low publicizing level lasting through the year and substantial promoting during pinnacle selling periods. Item classes that are sold all year; however, experience a flood in deals at irregular periods are great contenders for pulsing.
Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage refers to the situation when a firm can produce more of a commodity at the same cost, or same level of commodity at a lower cost.
Morocco can produce 25 metric tons of grain and 75 metric tons of date.
While France can produce 20 metric tons of grain and 10 metric tons of date.
We see that Morocco can produce more of both the commodities so it has an absolute advantage in production of both grain and dates.
Comparative advantage refers to the situation when a country is able to produce a commodity at a lower opportunity cost.
The opportunity cost of producing a metric ton of dates for Morocco is
= 
= 
= 0.2
The opportunity cost of producing a metric ton of dates for France is
= 
=
= 2
Morocco has a lower opportunity cost in producing dates so we can say that it has comparative advantage in producing dates.
The opportunity cost of producing a metric ton of grain for Morocco is
= 
= 
= 5
The opportunity cost of producing a metric ton of grain for France is
= 
= 
= 0.5
France has a lower opportunity cost in producing grains so we can say that it has comparative advantage in producing grains.
Answer: differentiation
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that employees in engineering and marketing divisions often disagree with each other about how to achieve targets mainly because they have unique backgrounds, experiences, and training.
The above source of conflict is due to differentiation. The differentiation is as a result of them not working in thesame divisions hence, they see things differently and not in the same way.