Advantages:
From a conservative or state-based ideology: it is much easier to control population since they rarely receive "strange" ideas or influence from outside. Domestic policies become much more important. In so, it becomes easier to set popular aims targeting citizens.
The country could(historically seen) stand the best defense against outside powers which could try to set an invasion. For example, the Great Wall of China turned out to set a strong defense against Mongols and other menaces along many centuries.
Disadvantages are listed:
Trading with other countries can influence negatively on economic growth, as there is no autonomous country even if it results as big as China.
Trade has become key in today's globalized world, henceforth the need to collaborate or cooperate in economic exchanges is a necessity to keep up the pace in global affairs.
Umayyad was more opened while Abbasid didn't want to interact with non-Arabs
Answer:
enduring,
single-issue,
candidate-centered,
fusion parties.
Explanation:
<u>Enduring parties:</u>
It's the type of minor parties that have existed for a long time but isn't as successful in getting their candidate elected like the major parties. Example : The Libertarian party
<u>Single issue parties:</u>
A type of minor party that is founded to pursue one specific. agenda/legislation. Example : The Green party
<u>Candidate-Centered :</u>
A minor party that is relied on the popularity of one member rather than established political platform. Example : Party affiliated Jesse Ventura in 1988 Minnesota election.
<u>Fusion Minor Parties:</u>
A minor party that does not necessarily aim to win the election. They acted as a supporter for another bigger party that have better chance to win. Example : The tea party.
That's right. The American Revolution was the first instance of guerrilla warfare; they had home turf advantage and were able to catch the British off guard frequently.
