1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vesna [10]
2 years ago
8

Why do you think the Supreme Court has upheld restrictions on free speech under some circumstances, but overturned restrictions

and others?
(this is a "what do you think?" question asked at the end of a passage about the Tinker v. De Moines case, if more information is needed to help answer the question please lmk)
Law
1 answer:
goblinko [34]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Perhaps to avoid people getting emotionally hurt?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Discuss the role of judicial review in relation to administrative agencies.
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer: First, courts will examine the statutory authority for an agency's action and will invalidate agency choices that exceed these limits. In addition, a court may examine an agency's discretionary decisions, or discrete actions with legal consequences for the public.

8 0
3 years ago
Can you pls help to number 1 23 thank you :)
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

1-a scientific theory is an in-depth explanation of the observed phenomenon. A law is a statement about an observed phenomenon or a unifying concept.

2-substantiated, explanatory, predictive, and testable

3-It is a misconception that theories turn into laws with enough research

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is one of the requirements that a company must meet
Maru [420]

Answer:

The company must first pay off all of its creditors

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This lesson reviewed how Supreme Court justices, as well as other
grigory [225]

Answer:

No, I do not agree. Judges should not be appointed for life. Sometimes the judges might have terible opinions and may be biased.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What were two reasons that others gave for NOT including a bill of rights?
stich3 [128]

Arguments against the Bill of Rights

The Federalists opposed including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. The Anti-Federalists, who were afraid of a strong centralized government, refused to support the Constitution without one.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act? Select one: a. Implements the principle that a signature, contract, or other record may not
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a form of government that gives local or state government all of the power?
    5·2 answers
  • Please explain what leadership positions are in the House of Representatives. Make sure to include all positions.
    15·1 answer
  • What courses could I take in high school to be better prepared for majoring in Criminology in college? Whats the difference betw
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP PLEASE I AM GIVING 10 POINTS AND WILL MARK BRANLIEST FOR FIRST ANSWER
    12·1 answer
  • Criminal acts range from relatively minor crimes, such as trespassing or shoplifting, to severe crimes, such as arson or murder.
    10·1 answer
  • A spouse can be provided information such as hospital
    13·1 answer
  • Name at least ten issues that Bob and Carol should talk about.
    6·1 answer
  • What did the french writer alexis de tocqueville call america
    9·2 answers
  • Which is an example of a secondary source?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!