Which of the following is true regarding the protection of "fighting words" under the First Amendment?a. Fighting words are unpr
otected speech under the First Amendmentb. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they are uttered by an individual citizen, not by a corporate representativec. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they involve political activityd. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they are made in connection with a protest marche. Fighting words are protected speech under the First Amendment only if they are made in conjunction with self defense
The statement that is true is: a. Fighting words are unprotected speech under the First Amendment.
Explanation:
The freedom of speech, which is a right included in the Constitution of the United States, has his limitations. For instance, fighting words, which are words that are used to show disconfort or disagreement of some sort became unprotected. The First Amendment does not protect fighing words, and the governmen is allow to limit speech when words said can bring fighting or disturbance.
17th-century English philosopher John Locke discussed natural rights in his work, identifying them as being "life, liberty, and estate (property)", and argued that such fundamental rights could not be surrendered in the social contract.
Look up "Unit 25: Adverse Driving Conditions" on Quizlet and those flashcards had the answer on them. (I'd add a link but that goes against the policies on this website- Quizlet is completely free)
