The correct answer is; An employer might be liable for the actions of its employees outside the scope of employment if the employer was negligent or reckless in allowing it to occur, or for other reasons.
Further Explanation:
One way that an employer can be liable for the actions outside of work and can be considered negligent outside of work is if the employee is still clocked in at work. For example, if the employee is on a break and clocked in and hits and runs a car and someone gets hurt, the employer can be liable.
To be classified as an employee there are a few things that must be done by the employer such as;
- Withhold income tax
- Pay employers share of social security tax
- Pay employers share of Medicare taxes
- Provide unemployment insurance for all employees
Learn more about employee rights at brainly.com/question/7890057
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
blood left at the scene includes the direct evidence.
Here's what will happen if the President does not return a bill and refuses to sign it:
- It means the President is effectively exercising their veto power.
- Yet, unless the Congress isn't in session during those ten (10) days, the bill will automatically become a law, though.
- The U.S. Constitution states that a vetoed bill may still become law if Congress overrides the president's decision with a supermajority vote of two-thirds of members of both the House and the Senate.
What is this veto power anyway?
To veto means to forbid or temporarily prohibit the execution of projects that have been attempted. However, since we're discussing the President's and the legislative branch's authority, vetoing refers to stopping a bill or the implementation of legislation passed by a legislature from becoming law, either permanently or temporarily.
Read about the concept of a pocket veto here: brainly.com/question/957050
#SPJ4
Answer:
Under Article 12 of the Revised Penal Code, a person is exempt from criminal liability if he acts under the compulsion of an irresistible force, or under the impulse of an uncontrollable fear of equal or greater injury, because such person does not act with freedom.
Explanation:
It basically gives a false represention
-that smoking gun evidence is the only form of evidence that can prove something beyond reasonable doubt
-it makes people biased against criminals
Basically those are my thoughts but there are probably more
