It's an example of "separation of powers". Hope this helps, sorry if it's wrong.
<span>They were nearly worthless by this time. With the numerous different types of money in circulation at the time and the valuation of this money at some 2.5% (1/40) their face value, the idea of having paper money was almost useless to the early American citizen.</span>
Answer:
it's incomplete question I don't understand this question !!
sorry
The correct answer to this open question was the following.
The difference in the perspectives of Americans and Cubans in regards to the Battle of San Juan Hill is that the Cubans were tired of the Spanish monarchy presence in the Island of Cuba, but had no means to get rid of the Spaniards and its powerful army. The American point of view was that the United States had the exclusive right to intervene and take care of the issues in the American continent, not the Europeans, that is why the First US Voluntary Cavalry, led by Theodore Roosevelt, tried to recapture Santiago de Cuba. To accomplish this, they had to fight a severe resistance in the Battle of San Juan Hill on July 1, 1898.
Answer:
The correct answer is - yes, it violates civil liberties.
Explanation:
After the incident of 9/11, the Patriot Act was enforced in the name of national security, which violates the fourth amendment that allows civil liberties. This act modified the surveillance laws.
By this modification, it is easier for the government to invade the privacy of ordinary Americans by monitor phone and email communications, collect bank and credit reporting records, and other private information.
