The answer is: a site that’s reliable and has information that can be trusted.
Nowadays it is difficult to rely on the information that can be found on the internet, and even more difficult it is to be able to discern by one´s own means what is accurate information and what is not. A reputable site is one that has earned society´s esteem and holds a good reputation by having proven that they are responsible for the information they convey and that the information has been verified and checked so that it can be corroborated by third parties. Newspaper sites strive to be reputable sites, for example.
Answer:
Anne uses sarcasm and humorous descriptions of her interactions especially with Mrs. van Daan.
Explanation:
At times, Anne uses humor as a way of dealing with the predicament she and her family are in. She especially uses sarcasm at times especially when she describes her interactions and clashes with her sister Margot. Anne mocks her sister in her diary and shows a bit of contempt how Margot is her mother's favorite. Anne has a lot of conflict with Mrs. van Daan or "Madame" as Anne calls her in her diary which in itself is tongue-in-cheek. The moment in her diary where Mrs. van Daan is expressing one of her many opinions regarding Anne's personality and demeanor, Madame says that Anne should eat more vegetables. This was countered with a remark by Anne's father about Madame was now a pot calling the kettle black. Anne explained how this was funny because she knew it referred to how Madame is not able to eat cabbage and beans late at night otherwise she gets a lot of gas.
Answer:
B. The Author says that parents will volunteer to help the teams.
Explanation:
The Author says that parents will volunteer to help the teams when they say "Schools could work with local professional teams to raise money. Volunteers could coach until the schools can affords to pay coaches. Many parents would be happy to volunteer to get teams started."
I hope this helps! Good Luck! :)
Answer:
A. A paradox is more of a contradiction than an affirmation.
B. No, a change in the environment would not likely be lethal to a highly adaptable species.
Explanation:
A. The official definition of a paradox, as provided by Merriam-Webster dictionary, is "a statement that is seemingly contradictory or opposed to common sense and yet is perhaps true". Therefore, it would be more of a contradiction because the things that are mentioned in them do not coincide. An example of a paradox would be the statement "There is no absolute truth". This is contradictory because you saying that there is no such thing as absolute truth yet you are also saying it definitively as if it were absolute truth. So, if there is no absolute truth, but the statement has an absolute truth claim, then the statement does not make sense and is a paradox.
B. If a species is highly adaptable, then it would be able to withstand any changes in the environment because it would adapt in each and every change. The changes in environment would not likely be lethal in this regard, and as a result, the species would not die off.