1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
givi [52]
3 years ago
6

5x + 2y = 7 Solve for y

Mathematics
2 answers:
nekit [7.7K]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is attached below:

ELEN [110]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

y=  7/2-5x/2

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
On Tuesday Katy ran a mile in 8.34 minutes. She ran another mile in 7.89 minutes on Wednesday. What was the total time for both
butalik [34]
The answer would be 16.23 minutes for both miles.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a triangle with vertices A(-1, 4), B(-1, -2), C(2, -2) is dilated with a scale factor of 2 and a center of dilation at the or
givi [52]

Answer:

A' (-2,8) B' (-2,-4) C' (4,-4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Dilations Rule :

(x,y) → (kx,ky)

Scale factor = K

When your scale factor is more than one our triangle gets bigger. When your scale factor is less than one our triangle gets smaller.

( you plug in 2 in every point and those are your answers).

Remember negative times negative is positive and positive times negative is negative.

5 0
2 years ago
Solve the equation for y <br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=8%20%3D%203x%20%2B%206y" id="TexFormula1" title="8 = 3x + 6y" alt
Shalnov [3]

move variable to the left side and change its sign

-3x+8=6y

Move constant to the right side and change its sign

-3x=6y-8

Divide both sides of the equation by -3

x=-2y+8/3


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Salk polio vaccine experiment in 1954 focused on the effectiveness of the vaccine in combating paralytic polio. Because it w
sdas [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The variables of interest are:

X₁: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the placebo vaccine.

n₁= 201299 total children studied

x₁= 110 cases observed

X₂: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the experimental vaccine.

n₂= 200745 total children studied

x₂= 33 cases observed

These two variables have a binomial distribution. The parameters of interest, the ones to compare, are the population proportions: p₁ vs p₂

You have to test if the population proportions of children who contracted polio in both groups are different: p₂ ≠ p₁

a)

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.05

Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }

Sample proportion placebo p'₁= x₁/n₁= 110/201299= 0.0005

Sample proportion vaccine p'₂= x₂/n₂= 33/200745= 0.0002

Pooled sample proportion p'= (x₁+x₂)/(n₁+n₂)= (110+33)/(201299+200745)= 0.0004

Z_{H_0}= \frac{(0.0002-0.0005)-0}{\sqrt{0.0004[\frac{1}{201299} +\frac{1}{200745} ]} }= -4.76

This test is two-tailed, using the critical value approach, you have to determine two critical values:

Z_{\alpha/2}= Z_{0.025}= -1.96

Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.975}= 1.96

Then if Z_{H_0} ≤ -1.96 or if Z_{H_0} ≥ 1.96, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -1.96 < Z_{H_0} < 1.96, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ Z_{H_0}= -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

b)

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.01

Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }

The value of Z_{H_0}= -4.76 doesn't change, since we are working with the same samples.

The only thing that changes alongside with the level of significance is the rejection region:

Z_{\alpha /2}= Z_{0.005}= -2.576

Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.995}= 2.576

Then if Z_{H_0} ≤ -2.576or if Z_{H_0} ≥ 2.576, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -2.576< Z_{H_0} < 2.576, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ Z_{H_0}= -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

c)

Remember the level of significance (probability of committing type I error) is the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis. This means that the smaller this value is, the fewer chances you have of discarding the true null hypothesis. But as you know, you cannot just reduce this value to zero because, the smaller α is, the bigger β (probability of committing type II error) becomes.

Rejecting the null hypothesis using different values of α means that there is a high chance that you reached a correct decision (rejecting a false null hypothesis)

I hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
Steve walked away from his girlfriend. Chose the graph that shows steves distance from his girlfriend as time goes by.
Solnce55 [7]
What Graph? There is no attachment
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • -10 = -3x - 82<br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20-%2010%20%3D%20%20-%203x%20-%2082" id="TexFormula1" title=" - 10 = - 3x
    9·1 answer
  • Solve for x 15x+5x 14x-6
    10·1 answer
  • Prove that there are infinitely many primes of the form 4k + 3, where k is a non-negative integer. [Hint: Suppose that there are
    14·2 answers
  • The middle 5 in 0.555 is 1/10 the value of the 5 to its
    11·1 answer
  • Sonia is creating a visual diagram to show the relationship between rational numbers and integers. She draws it to show that som
    8·1 answer
  • I NEED HELP ON THIS MATH ASAP
    12·1 answer
  • The area of the triangle below is 2/5 square foot what is the length, in feet, of the base of the triangle
    10·1 answer
  • How wide is a poster that has a length of
    10·2 answers
  • If 5 is 20% of N,then what does N equal
    11·2 answers
  • What is the slope of the line that passes through the points (3, 4) and (0, -2)
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!