1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Komok [63]
3 years ago
13

? Which phrase describes what the "push and pull" theory was about?

History
1 answer:
Jlenok [28]3 years ago
5 0
A push factor is something that pushes someone away from their home country, such as a war in their home country,, a pull factor is something that pulls someone to a new country, such as the promise of new lands/ new opportunity or gold
You might be interested in
When were the Intolerable acts passed? what was their purpose?​
amm1812
The Intolerable Acts were passed in the year 1774. It was Britain’s version of punishment for the colonies in defiance from the Boston Tea Party. This act closed Boston’s port until the tea that was thrown into the ocean was paid.
7 0
3 years ago
What religion gives Chinese society it's social order?
Arisa [49]
It sounds like Confucianism and filal piety but Confucianism is a philosophy not a religion. Hope that helped though!
3 0
3 years ago
How did each of the following contribute to the development of the Atlantic
kakasveta [241]
The Americans were huge areas of fertile land, and the European powers needed people to work on its fields. African slaves were a cheap and abundant solution.
4 0
2 years ago
Which sentence best summarizes the Persian War?
Burka [1]

Based on information, your corrct answer would be Option C. Before battles, the Persian Empire became very strong, and they had a good leadership mainly because of Cyrus. And because they were so strong and they had enough power, they simply just drove them out of their land and expanded there land control over to Asia.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The decades around the year 50 BC saw the end of the Roman Republic, and the rise of the Roman Empire. What factors led to the d
dem82 [27]

The aristocracy (wealthy class) dominated the early Roman Republic. In Roman society, the aristocrats were known as patricians. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the Roman Republic. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls. At this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government. Both men and women were citizens in the Roman Republic, but only men could vote.

Tradition dictated that patricians and plebeians should be strictly separated; marriage between the two classes was even prohibited. Over time, the plebeians elected their own representatives, called tribunes, who gained the power to veto measures passed by the senate.

Gradually, the plebeians obtained even more power and eventually could hold the position of consul. Despite these changes, though, the patricians were still able to use their wealth to buy control and influence over elected leaders.

The Roman Senate

The history of the Roman Senate goes as far back as the history of Rome itself. It was first created as a 100-member advisory group for the Roman kings. Later kings expanded the group to 300 members. When the kings were expelled from Rome and the Republic was formed, the Senate became the most powerful governing body. Instead of advising the head of state, it elected the chief executives, called consuls.

Senators were, for centuries, strictly from the patrician class. They practiced the skills of rhetoric and oratory to persuade other members of the ruling body. The Senate convened and passed laws in the curia, a large building on the grounds of the Roman Forum. Much later, Julius Caesar built a larger curia for an expanded Senate.

By the 3rd century B.C.E., Rome had conquered vast territories, and the powerful senators sent armies, negotiated terms of treaties, and had total control over the financial matters of the Republic.

Senatorial control was eventually challenged by Dictator Sulla around 82 B.C.E. Sulla had hundreds of senators murdered, increased the Senate's membership to 600, and installed many nonpatricians as senators. Julius Caesar raised the number to 900 (it was reduced after his assassination). After the creation of the Roman Empire in 27 B.C.E., the Senate became weakened under strong emperors who often forcefully coerced this ruling body. Although it survived until the fall of Rome, the Roman Senate had become merely a ceremonial body of wealthy, intelligent men with no power to rule.

Occasionally, an emergency situation (such as a war) arose that required the decisive leadership of one individual. Under these circumstances, the Senate and the consuls could appoint a temporary dictator to rule for a limited time until the crisis was resolved. The position of dictator was very undemocratic in nature. Indeed, a dictator had all the power, made decisions without any approval, and had full control over the military.

The best example of an ideal dictator was a Roman citizen named Cincinnatus. During a severe military emergency, the Roman Senate called Cincinnatus from his farm to serve as dictator and to lead the Roman army. When Cincinnatus stepped down from the dictatorship and returned to his farm only 15 days after he successfully defeated Rome's enemies, the republican leaders resumed control over Rome.

The early Roman Republic often found itself in a state of constant warfare with its surrounding neighbors. In one instance, when the Romans were fighting the Carthaginians, Rome was nearly conquered. The people of Carthage (a city in what is today Tunisia in north Africa) were a successful trading civilization whose interests began to conflict with those of the Romans.

The two sides fought three bloody wars, known as the Punic Wars (264-146 B.C.E.), over the control of trade in the western Mediterranean Sea. In the second war, Hannibal, a Carthaginian general, successfully invaded Italy by leading an army — complete with elephants — across the Alps. He handed the Roman army a crushing defeat but was unable to sack the city of Rome itself. After occupying and ravaging Italy for more than a decade, Hannibal was finally defeated by the Roman general Scipio at the Battle of Zama in 202 B.C.E. Hope You Like My Answer!:)


3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the aftermath of the 2010 haiti earthquake, relief was slow in coming and looting was commonplace. for those who were caught
    12·1 answer
  • According to Divine Command theorists,
    10·1 answer
  • When interests rates are low, spending decreases. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
    14·2 answers
  • Why was Hamilton’s Bank of the United States the most controversial part of his financial program?
    12·1 answer
  • How did Booker T. Washington’s Atlanta Compromise Speech enable him to help provide educational opportunities for other African
    10·1 answer
  • T
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Please name the two theaters that WW2 took place in. What brought us into the war in the first place? How did we end the war?
    10·1 answer
  • Which two things did civilization learn in the Middle East?
    8·1 answer
  • How does art change people lives
    12·1 answer
  • Should the federal government or the state government control laws about the use of marijuana?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!