Answer:
A well-respected chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank suddenly resigns
Explanation:
A non-diversifiable or systematic risk, is a risk which is common to a whole market or class of investments and not just limited to just a particular company or investment.
Non-systematic risk is a risk common to just an investment or a company.
If the chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank suddenly resigns, it would affect a wide range of investments in the market and not just a company, which is an example of a non-diversifiable risk.
Answer:
D) a rise in price
Explanation:
At the equilibrium point, the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied are the same. There is no excess shortage or supply in both demand and supply.
A shortage occurs when suppliers are not able to meet the market demand. Here, demand is the quantity that buyers are willing to buys at a specific price over time. As per the law of demand, high product price causes demand to decrease while low price results in increased demand.
A shortage of a product means its demand is high. Many buyers are willing to buy the commodity at the current price. As per the law of demand, a price increase will result in reduced demand and achieve equilibrium.
Answer: it doesn't matter.
Explanation:
It doesn't matter how much money you make along as you have money to support yourself
Answer:
The correct answer is
: Yes, the offer was revoked by Katherine.
Explanation:
Even if Paul replied Katherine with the acceptance to the first offer, he used a different means of communication to do that -<em>e-mail v. mail</em>. In addition, Katherine sent the revoke by mail -<em>as in the initial offer</em>- before Paul sent his e-mail. So, there is enough proof on Katherine's end that she didn't want to proceed with the offer before Paul confirmed his agreement on the terms. In that sense, Katherine did revoke the initial order.
Answer:
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
economic order quantity, EOQ= 55 units
annual demand, D=235
holding cost per one unit per year, H=40%×$11=$4.4
ordering cost, S=?
In order to calculate the ordering cost we would have to use the following formula:
EOQ=√(<u>2×D×S)</u>
(H)
Hence, S=<u>(EOQ)∧2×H</u>
2×D
S=<u>(55)∧2×4.4</u>
2×235
S=<u>13,310</u>
470
S=$28.31
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order
