Answer: The correct answer is "e. An amount assigned to no-par stock by the corporation's board of directors.".
Explanation: Stated value of no-par stock is: <u>An amount assigned to no-par stock by the corporation's board of directors.</u>
<u>The board of directors of the corporation are those who designate a declared value for no-par stock.</u>
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
For account receivable turnover ratio
Accounts Receivable Turnover is
= Sales ÷ Average Receivables
Beginning Accounts Receivable $21,400
Add: Sales $105,300
Less: Cash Receipts $81,300
Ending Accounts Receivable $45,400
Now
Accounts Receivable Turnover is
= $105,300 ÷ ($21,400 + $45,400) ÷ 2
= 3.15 times
Now days to sell is
= 365 ÷ 3.15 times
=116 days
<span>Gavina places products in several of the marketing channel categories. Two examples of this are placement in mcdonald's in a time utility category and placement in costco in the place utility category.
McDonald's falls under the time utility category because they streamline their services by making the ordering process to leaving with food as fast as possible. Those people wanting to save time and/or get the most value for their time often pick a fast food chain.
Cosco is an ample of place utility because they group together large quantities of </span>items that many consumers want into one place. By doing this, they allow the buyer more options in one place making items more easily accessible.
Answer:
NPV =$ 60,311.80
Explanation:
<em>The net present value (NPV) of a project is the present value of cash inflow less the present value of cash outflow of the project.</em>
NPV = PV of cash inflow - PV of cash outflow
We can set out the cash flows of the project using the table below:
0 1 2 3
Operating cash flow 136,000 136,000 136,000
Initial cost (274,000)
Working capital (61,000 ) 61,000
Salvage value <u> </u> <u> </u> <u> </u> 1<u>5000 </u>
Net cashflow <u> (335,000) 136,000 136,000 212,000.</u>
PV inflow= (136000)× (1.1)^(-1) + (136,000× (1.1)^(-2) + (112,000)× (1.1)^(-3)
= 395,311.80
NPV =395,311.80 -335,000
=$ 60,311.80
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
