1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SOVA2 [1]
3 years ago
9

The British rule in India caused the Indians to unite and create a more nationalistic pride and self-reliance, thus the rule of

the British was, in a sense, necessary. Agree or Disagree? Explain your opinion.
History
1 answer:
tangare [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Moderately Agree that it enhanced unity, national price, self reliance. But don't agree that it was 'necessary'

Explanation:

Britishers ruled India from around late 1750s to 1947. India's freedom from exploitative colonial rule was remarkable. The freedom struggle & fight ignited a sense of national unity, national pride - irrespective of caste, creed, community, gender, class. A sense self reliance & urge for freedom was unitedly looked upon, as evident from movements like 'quit india' 'swadeshi'.

However, their rule by divide & rule policy also created many communal rifts. Also, such immensely exploitative rule, which by chance had a positive side effect of unity among adversity - cant be called 'necessary' (it would be unjustified to call it that). Unity & national pride could be achieved by some progressive means also.

You might be interested in
The first written plan of self-government of an American colony was the A) Magna Carta. B) Mayflower Compact. C) Petition of Rig
lina2011 [118]
B. mayflower compact bruh
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the British and American governments turn their populations into supporters of war?
Rashid [163]
Don’t trust the link it can sometimes lead to bad things
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following movements started in Great Britain in the early 1980s when then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher started
Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

B. Privatization.

Explanation:

The transition of government ownership or business to the private sector is called privatization. The proponents of privatization emphasize that the profit earning behavior of new managers in the private sector would lead to cost reductions and better attention to customer satisfaction in the roles that are privatized.  

As per the question, The selling of state-owned assets to private telephone company is an example of privatization.

5 0
3 years ago
What do survivors of the Black Death want to do
UNO [17]

black death issssssssssss i don't


7 0
3 years ago
Which Supreme Court Justice was the most conservative?
alex41 [277]

The correct answer is letter A. O'Connor

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was a result of the Emancipation Proclamation?
    11·2 answers
  • Which was NOT an accomplishment under Monroe's presidency?
    13·2 answers
  • What is Benjamin franklins middle name?
    11·2 answers
  • Two Three One --- - party systems are most common in the English-speaking countries of the world.
    13·2 answers
  • According to lincoln's second inaugural address (pages 279–280), before the war, the us government wanted to _______ slavery?
    8·1 answer
  • Opponents of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 inserted the prohibition against ________ in employment in hopes of preventing its pas
    7·2 answers
  • Describe and explain roman architecture?
    6·1 answer
  • 3. Which of the following religions have a significant number of adherents
    13·1 answer
  • 02:57:38
    6·1 answer
  • What role did the government play in Progressive goals?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!