Aaron Douglass is the answer i believe
A, because at this time, Walter Cronkite delivered his famous "unwinnable war" speech B. because the coverage of the war became a great deal more objective C. because, after a long time coming, media coverage became extremely graphic D. because, after a long policy of not commenting on the war, Lyndon B. Johnson spoke out against the media E. because the controversial image of a U.S.-ally general shooting a communist was broadcast, beginning a trend away from upbeat coverage of the war
Hope I helped? ^ω^
Answer:
I would say what was most important would be the adoption of agriculture. Humans no longer had to move around and spend their days solely focusing on finding food. Being able to settle down and make one's own food allowed humans to have free time, and create hierarchies and languages and art, creating societies and civilization.
I think rationing had both positive and negative impact on the morale in the country.
Explanation:
According to me rationing had both positive and negative impact because the people who had already less resources were forced to live without or even very less resources. They were already living were in the state of misery due to the lack of money and other things.
The process of rationing put pressure on them to have lesser resources. While the people who had the more financial power and more available resources learnt to live with the limited resources.
