1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
poizon [28]
3 years ago
5

On April 21, 1836 the Texas forces launched a surprise attack on a sleeping Mexican army. The Mexicans were thoroughly routed an

d Santa Anna was captured. in exchange for his freedom, Santa Anna signed a treaty -
A. ordering the massacre of Texas troops

B. recognizing Texas' independence


C. upholding the Mexican Constitution of 1824


D. commanding the destruction of the Alamo

PLS HURRY if you can !!!!
History
1 answer:
Dima020 [189]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: B. recognizing Texas' independence

You might be interested in
Which American writer spent time in jail for protesting the war with Mexico
Jet001 [13]
The writer was Henry David Thoreau. The whole idea and concept of this was with "Civil Disobedience"
 Hope this helps! If correct please make brainiest answer so everyone knows!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which council deals with military and foreign policy questions?
jekas [21]
<span>National securiyNational Security</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Why were Americans looking to improve their transportation systems in the early 1800s?
CaHeK987 [17]

Explanation:

industrial revolution led to bigger concentration of populations in cities & labor

4 0
3 years ago
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following Supreme Court cases directly relates to the phrase "separate but equal"?
Ivan
I think your answer would be A
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!
    10·2 answers
  • How are mutual funds similar? How are they different?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the key differnce between a federal government and a confederate government?
    8·1 answer
  • What is an affirmation ya say when you want to feel at peace?
    14·2 answers
  • Paul Robeson supported the idea that:
    7·2 answers
  • What does this map show about the importance of the West Coast of North America?
    14·1 answer
  • What are the most powerful "checks" a president has
    12·1 answer
  • Bro i really need help:<br> What effect did the Pyramid of Giza have on Egypt?
    14·2 answers
  • What was one important contribution of Archimedes?
    15·2 answers
  • Items brought back to England like timber, fish, or gold:​
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!