The people will find out that the car that killed myrtle is gatsby's and will come after him regardless of who's driving.
B, it tells how long the tree takes to grow
or
c, this answer tells how long the acorns take to grow therefore making half-grown acorns
b) The National Collegiate Athletic Association, or NCAA, earned a staggering $1 billion in 2017, and college athletes will never see a penny of that profit.
Option B is the best hook for an argument in favor of paying college athletes. A hook is the first sentence or two of the essay that gets the reader interested in the topic of the essay. In this hook, the author provides startling data to hook the audience. People may want to better understand what the NCAA does with all that money. It's also obvious this hook what the author's stance is on the topic. The use of the word "staggering" and "never" set the tone that author is appalled by this. Option A is too vague. So what if they make a lot of money...good for them. Or the audience might already know it. Why would they then want to read the essay. Option D has a similar problem. The question is a yes or no answer. The audience says no so what then, or even if they say yes. Where does the essay go from there? A hook should entice the audience and make them want more.
FALSE. <span>An appositive DOES NOT function like an adverb in a given sentence
Appositive is defined as a noun or noun phrase that renames a noun beside it.
Example
Mrs. Santos, our teacher, is the best teacher in Math.
"our teacher" is the appositive phrase. It renames Mrs. Santos. </span>
Answer:
Nationalism is dangerous to globalization.
Explanation:
Although nationalism and globalization can coexist, nationalism is very dangerous for the purposes of globalization. This is because globalization aims to promote a great global network of cooperation, where national borders are forgotten and all peoples share their resources, discoveries and benefits. Nationalism, on the other hand, is characterized as the over-valorization of national concepts and values, that is, of a single nationality and a single culture. In this case, nationalism can combat global cooperation and reinforce national and cultural boundaries, which is totally against the objectives of globalization.
