Answer:
The Supreme Court's ruling is valid because a liberty guaranteeing device is a right to freedom of religion and speech. Our founding fathers escaped the vestiges of one religion, which was the only acceptable religion. They escaped sectarianism and ignorance. Therefore, the freedom of speech and freedom of religion differentiates this country from the rest. The right to express my opinion is the right that we all share. As well as, the right to worship anywhere we please.
Explanation:
Pope uses <span>exaggeration, understatement, satire, and possibly sarcasm and double entendre.</span>
Most likely in Medieval China
Answer: A
Explanation: A is the answer because a direct characterization is saying shy is her trait
Answer:
- Question of value.
Explanation:
As per the question, Megan employs a 'question of value' kind of persuasive speech that is inclined towards arguing a specific value to be ethical or unethical, moral or immoral, and determining conclusions accordingly. Such a speech proposes an ethical appeal in order to evoke a judgmental reaction or response from the audience like Megan argues that 'providing similar rights or privileges regardless of the gender, race, sex, etc.' aims to reflect the righteousness of immorality associated with the issue. This ethical argument leads to elicit a morally judgmental response from the audience. Therefore, it exemplifies <u>'question of value'.</u>