1. elephant
2.wheel
3. blink
4.white
5.skunk
6.think
7.strong
8.thanksgiving
Darn I do not know but go on google and look up the answers i hope that that will help if not ask for help.
Sorry
Monuments honoring Christopher Columbus are being defaced and destroyed. This year’s
Columbus Day celebrations will spark strong debate over the explorer’s legacy, but by looking
at Columbus in the big picture of history, one can see today’s anti-Columbian fury is either
misguided or part of a blind political agenda to demonize early European activity in the New
World.
First, let’s consider the matter of European disease transmission, principally smallpox, which
is estimated to have killed 70 to 80 percent of Native Americans. While those numbers are
staggering, the deaths happened over many decades. Holding Columbus responsible is
beyond preposterous. Further, calculating an actual number of deaths is impossible because
estimates of pre-Columbus populations vary enormously. In Hispaniola, for example, the range
runs from 250,000 to 3 million.
I believe the answer is C) the author provides a personal example and a reference to a movie to support his idea
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Read this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence: The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. The document then goes on to list a series of charges that denounce British rule of the American colonies. In the context of the Declaration of Independence, what does the author mean by “candid world”? What effect does this word choice have on the rhetoric as well as the intended audience of the text?
Answer and Explanation:
In the context of the declaration of independence, the author uses the text "candid world" to refer to the target audience and obtain the approval and support of that audience. This is because the word "candid" represents something pure and has not been corrupted. When the author uses this word to refer to the audience, he is stating that this audience is honest, impartial and correct. In this way, he wants to awaken the public's feelings and logic, which will support the idea that the government should not be biased, but honest and integral.