I would say the correct answer is that the insane live in a reality of their own.
The protagonist of the story wasn't always insane; however, over time, he grew mad because of his landlord's eye of a vulture. He began seeing things, thinking that the eye made him do crazy things, such as kill the old man. After that, this mad man kept hearing the dead man's heart beating, which is how he revealed his crime to the policemen who came to the house to investigate.
Answer:
The point of view of a story is the perspective from which a story is told
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer would be option C, Reina's fingers hurt when she play guitar for two hours a day, she tells her mother that all guitarists feel pain when they play for a long time.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is the method of reasoning in which the statement issues by anyone is supplied with some real evidence. It starts with the narrow perspective and is linked with the generalized view of that. So in option C, Reina is telling her mother about how her finger hurts while playing guitar, then she tells that it happens with all guitarists when they play for a long time. This means she is broadening her perspective by starting with her own example and then generalizing it to all guitarists.
The events of Act III (Hamlet) in the correct order;
- Polonius and Claudius spy on Hamlet and Ophelia.
- Hamlet gives his "to be or not to be" speech.
- Hamlet tells Ophelia to get a nunnery.
- Hamlet tells Gertrude he must go to England.
- Claudius confesses his murder to the audience.
- Hamlet has the chance to kill Claudius, but hesitates.
- Claudius runs from the room shouting, "Give me some light!".
<h3>What is chronological order?</h3>
Chronological order is the arrangements of events from the first to the last, that is, from the oldest to the most recent event.
Learn more about Hamlet:
brainly.com/question/8182660
Answer:
comparison and contrast connection
Explanation:
In simple words, A comparative-and-contrast article analyses three students by either referencing them, clashing them, or even both. The objective of composing a compare or contrast dissertation would be not to show the apparent, but instead to highlight the nuanced discrepancies or unforeseen parallels here between the two topics.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is D.
