Answer:
Safety Stock.
Explanation:
Safety Stock is held to respond to the uncertainties in demand and supply levels because it is an additional amount of a product or material which is generally held in an inventory to mitigate or lessen the risk that a product or material will become out of
stock.
In Business management, the safety stock can be calculated using the following formula;
<em>Safety stock = (Md * Ml) - (Ad * Al) </em>
Where;
Md = maximum daily usage.
Ml = maximum lead time in days.
Ad = average daily usage.
Al = average lead time in days.
The option that is not correct with respect to using bcc for recipients of a message is this:
- It should be the default for all correspondence.
<h3 /><h3>What is the Blind Carbon Copy?</h3>
Blind carbon copy is a way of preventing the recipients of a bulk message from viewing the other addressees. While it is a very good privacy option, it is not expected to be the default for all correspondence.
Sometimes, the addressees might have to view their counterparts so BCC is enabled in such cases.
Learn more about the Blind Carbon Copy here:
brainly.com/question/3594902
#SPJ11
C business mileage during the year to claim the standard mileage rate for the business
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
D. would be the correct answer I believe!
