All categories

2 years ago

Under GAAP-based costing, what assumption justifies allocating organization-level manufacturing overhead among products?

1 answer:

7 0

Because the costs associated with organization-level manufacturing overhead among products are untraceable, it is not possible to specify what product was responsible for what overhead, so GAAP-based costing accounts for the untraceability.

You might be interested in

Given a function <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=f%28x%29%3D3x%5E4-5x%5E2%2B2x-3" id="TexFormula1" title="f(x)=3x^4-5x^2+2x-3"

Levart [38]

Answer:

$\huge\boxed{f(-1) = -7}$

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to solve for this function, we need to substitute in our value of x inside to find f(x). Since we are trying to evalue f(-1), we will substitute -1 in as x to our equation.

$f(-1) = 3(-1)^4 - 5(-1)^2 + 2(-1) - 3$

Now we can solve for the function by multiplying/subtracting/adding our known values.

Starting with the first term to the last term:

$3(-1)^4 = 3$

WAIT! How is this possible? $-1^4 = -1$ (according to my calculator), and $3 \cdot -1 = -3$ , not 3!

It's important to note that taking a power of a negative number and multiplying a negative number are two different things. Let's use $-2^2$ as an example.

What your calculator did was follow BEMDAS since it wasn't explicitly told not to.

BEMDAS:

- Brackets

- Exponents

- Multiplication/Division

- Addition/Subtraction

Examining the equation, your calculator used this rule properly. Note that exponents come over multiplication.

So rather than being "-2 squared" - it's "the negative of of 2 squared."

Tying this back into our problem, the squared method would only be true if it looks like $-1^4$ . However, since we're substituting in -1, it looks like $(-1)^4$ , so the expression reads out as "-1 to the fourth."

MULTIPLYING -1 by itself 4 times results in $-1\cdot-1\cdot-1\cdot-1=1$ .

Applying this logic to our original term, $3(-1)^4$ :

$3(-1\cdot-1\cdot-1\cdot-1)$
$3(1)$
$3$

Therefore, our first term is 3.

Let's move on to our second and third terms.

Second term: $-5x^2$

$-5(-1)^2$

Applying the same logic from our first term:

$-5(-1 \cdot -1)$
$-5(1)$
$-5$

Third term: $2x$

$2(-1) = -2$

-3 is just -3, no influence of x.

Combining our terms, we have $3-5-2-3$ .

This comes out to be -7, hence, the value of $f(-1)$ for our function $f(x)=3x^4-5x^2+2x-3$ is -7.

Hope this helped!

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Point C is twice as close to point B as it is to point A. If point A is at -30 and point B is at 30, what are two possible value

arsen [322]

different between A and B

=30-(-30)

=60

position of C from A or B

=(60÷3)×2

=40

possible value of c

=-30+40

=10

possible value of c

=30-40

=-10

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can sombody plz help me?!

larisa86 [58]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The posssibility that a random person will not buy any dramas is 3/4 since 1/4 is the one with drama and there's 4 types of movies.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who knows how to do this Bc I don’t understand

Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

WV should be equal to XY

Step-by-step explanation:

since it is the HL postulate meaning hypotenuse and leg, we need to show that the hypotenuses of both triangles are equal since we are already given that one of their legs are congruent. we are also given that they are right triangles.

7 0

2 years ago

Two Factors of 36 add up to 15. what are they

lana66690 [7]

The answer is three and twelve

8 0

2 years ago