Answer:
△ABX ≅ △ACY, by reason that they are equal and congruent to each other.
I hope this answers your question.
A: the formula would be f(x) = P(R) ^T or f(x) = Principle(rate)^time
B: f(x) = 20,000(0.85)^5
C: = 8,874.10625
D: Yes, the final answer makes sense compared to the origional cost of the car in relation to the formula. As well, time decreases the value of a car, so for the cost to be so low only makes sense due to the cars decrease in value or an extended and elongated amount of time.
E: You can solve this equation graphically by plotting th point at 20,000 and then taking 85% of 20,000 and plotting it each time until you get to the fifth year.
1. Divide $10.43 by 7 to find out how much each pound of grapes costs.
$10.43/7=$1.49
2. Multiply $1.49 by 3 to find out how much 3 pounds of grapes would cost.
$1.49•3=$4.47
3. So, 3 pounds of grapes would cost $4.47
Hope this helps!
Answer:
It takes less time sending 5 letters the traditional way with a probability of 36.7%.
Step-by-step explanation:
First we must take into account that:
- The traditional method is distributed X ~ Poisson(L = 1)
- The new method is distributed X ~ Poisson(L = 5)

Where L is the intensity in which the events happen in a time unit and x is the number of events.
To solve the problem we must calculate the probability of events (to send 5 letters) in a unit of time for both methods, so:
- For the traditional method:

- For the new method:

According to this calculations we have a higher probability of sending 5 letters with the traditional method in a unit of time, that is 36.7%. Whereas sending 5 letters with the new method is less probable in a unit of time. In other words, we have more events per unit of time with the traditional method.
2 tens = 20
13 ones = 13
20 + 13 = 33
33 is your answer
hope this helps