1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PtichkaEL [24]
3 years ago
9

Comparative rehtero analysis essay ​

English
1 answer:
blagie [28]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

what

Explanation:

You might be interested in
1. Story ends , questions are answered, and the theme is clear
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

1. is only one ik

Explanation:

In my interactions with writers, the topic of the story question has come up at least half a dozen times in the last few months. It’s a topic I haven’t addressed here at the blog, so this is obviously the time for a discussion of the subject.

The story question and story problem are major components of the foundation of your story. They get a story started, they give it focus, they guide characters and readers through story events, and they even declare when the story’s end has arrived.

The story problem is what gets your protagonist involved in the events that make up your book. A problem may be a murder or the kidnapping of the president’s daughter or the meeting of a new lover who may prove to be more than just a fling.

To solve the story problem, the protagonist has to fix something, find something, prevent something, do something.

The story question arises out of the problem. Will our character—let’s call her Abigail—find the murderer or the kidnapped child? Will Abigail fall in love with Donnell? Will Abigail prevent the overthrow of the government, find the treasure, find herself?

The story problem is the impetus behind story events; it drives your main character’s actions. Needing the answer to the story question is what keeps readers turning pages.

Story events and character thoughts and dialogue should be all about solving the story problem—from the characters’ point of view—and answering the story question—from the readers’ point of view. All the elements of the story should serve the story problem and question.

There’s little time for incidentals and rabbit trails.

Absent some direct connection, a chapter about slavery in Peru has no place in a science fiction novel about time travel to the twenty-fourth century. A treatise on the making of leather shoes doesn’t belong in a lighthearted romance.

Yes, some story events serve to reveal character and increase tension or conflict and may only tangentially seem to be “about” the plot, yet you’ll find that you can’t continually serve tangents to your readers. They’ll wonder what such events and details have to do with the story, with this story.

You’ve likely run into the problem yourself. You’re reading and suddenly wonder why the main character has stopped for a vacation in Greece. If nothing from the vacation has to do with the character resolving the story problem, you lose interest. The story has lost its focus and no matter how interesting the digression, if it doesn’t lead toward solving the story problem and answering the story question, it doesn’t have a place in the story.

This doesn’t mean that a story can’t have multiple story threads and a secondary plot. It does mean that the story as a whole needs to be cohesive and that each scene should be part of the mechanism that moves the main character closer to solving the story problem.

We need secondary characters to add comic relief or to help flesh out our main characters. And we certainly need to show our characters doing more than making a beeline toward solving the problem—major characters are not one-dimensional, with only one thought on their minds at all times. And yet stories don’t wander all over the map. Characters don’t—can’t—involve themselves in every issue under the sun. Major characters focus on solving the story problem, and readers focus on seeing how the story question is answered.

And writers have to make sure that both characters are readers are satisfied.

4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HURRY
arsen [322]

Answer:

I believe it is: Li's speech is more effective because it uses visuals of maps and timelines.

Explanation:

Li gave evidence of freedom. While Jackie just repeated phrases over and over again. Jackie's Speech could've sounded like this:

"Freedom is good. Freedom gives people opportunities. Freedom is good because it gives people opportunities. Freedom makes people happy. Freedom is good to make people happy."

Do you see how boring that is? Jackie is just repeating over and over again that "freedom is good."

On the other hand, Li could have something like this: (Please note I just made up the dates to state my point)

"Back in 1745, slaves were kept as.. well slaves. It was not right. So Abraham Lincoln decided to free them. (Here Li would show a graph of how happy the African Americans became after they were free.) Do you see how the happy bar increased?"

Li's speech is waaay more interesting. I hope I have helped! :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements is NOT​ true? A. The thesis statement is like the topic sentence for a paragraph in that it is
Alisiya [41]
The statement that is NOT true is B. The thesis statements DOES NOT focus on a single aspect of the subject, it focuses on the subject as a whole.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why people with a disability needs straw? Can someone give reasons and evidence and make it in paragraph , I’m not good in writi
WARRIOR [948]

Answer:

maybe the person is paralyzed from the neck down and cant use their hands to drink. Brainliest pleeease

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A short speech on "Travelling Give Your Heart Wings "​
Leona [35]

Answer:

As young people most of us have a pretty established comfort zone. At home with mom and dad, in a community that has known you for probably a good part of your life. You have your established, friends, activities, hangouts and possibly jobs. We become comfortable in these daily roles and the idea of breaking out them can be scary and uncomfortable.

The problem is, you learn the most in uncomfortable, unfamiliar situations. In our daily routines, you know how to act and respond to people and your surroundings. Being in a new place, with different people, who hold different values and go about life differently (or not so differently you may find) strips all that familiarity away.

It can be scary, but once you figure out that you can connect with people despite differences, and you can navigate foreign environments, you become a smarter, more competent individual. Embrace the discomfort. Search for it, because it is helping you grow.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • the fact that abraham lincoln was able to ( surmount, terminate) the hanicap of a limited education does not mean that you shoul
    10·2 answers
  • 4. Which techniques did Van Gogh use to create this self-portrait? (1 point)
    12·1 answer
  • Write down a topic sentence for each prompt:
    13·2 answers
  • Jefferson's use of four premises followed by a conclusion in the preamble is an example of
    9·1 answer
  • Identifying rhyme scheme:
    14·1 answer
  • What is the the difference between sports and games?
    9·2 answers
  • In the canterbury tales, the pilgrims agree (blank) to participate in a storytelling contest.
    5·2 answers
  • What word suggests a negative connotation of being thin?
    6·2 answers
  • Personal opinion: <br> Does obedience kill creativity? Why or why not?
    11·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from "Let Bindi Have the Limelight."
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!