The reaction to Moshe the Beadle's story is one of rejection with being dismissive. The Jewish individuals of Sighet essentially negate his story. Their rationales are not openly asserted, but are clearly present.
Could be the last three tbh one of those
Firstly, Frodo offers the ring to Gandalf, for he is of it's power and does not think he can be trusted with it. Gandalf realizes that if he had the ring, he would've been corrupted by it, and as such refuses.
The ring is never offered to Legolas.
The ring is never offered to Sam, although he offers to carry it in some cases, and before Frodo was dragged to Cirith Ungol, Sam did take it off of him.
The ring is offered to Galadriel, but she declines for the same reasons as Gandalf.
Secondly, the main theme represented by Aragorn would be You cannot judge a book by its cover.
The other ones don't make too much sense.
Aragorn certainly did not believe in might makes right.
While Aragorn's love story was present in the book, it was far from his main theme, and Arwen rarely appeared.
And while the concept of All good things must come to an end is in the book, it is not represented by Aragorn. It is represented by the elves and their leaving from Middle Earth, Aragorn shows new birth with the kingdom of Men.
Hope this helps :)
Answer: Clementes Impact
Explanation: His impact was to show that his people were as good as any other people
D
In Walden, Thoureau presents a lesson of wisdom about the best way to life as an individual and as a social being.
What would look like excentricity to most people, means to him a reflection about the capitalism and the advantages and disadvantages of urbanization and industrialization.
The trancendentalism defended the vality of the intuition, and individualism. So it fits with the thoughts of Thoureau about the industrialization and reflections about life, as it is possible to confirm in Walden when a question is frequently asked about what is really important to the basic needs for the modern man to have a good life. He defends that it is possible to have a good life with the minimum of material resources to provide whatever the spirit needs, such as reading, reflections about life and nature watching. On the other hand, he afirms that it is possible to have a good life without an excess of clothes, food or fancy houses.
