Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": That the oral agreement fell outside the statute of frauds if the plaintiff satisfied the main-purpose doctrine.
Explanation:
<em>Power Entertainment Inc. </em>sued <em>National Football League Properties Inc.</em>(NFLP), saying the other party violated an oral agreement to allow it to assume a third party debt if the other party would allow it to acquire valuable third party business licenses previously held. The Court of Appeals ruled that fraud status did not apply in such cases in Texas, the state where it all took place.
Checks and balances is the answer.
Answer:
- Common laws
- Precedent
Explanation:
'Blackstone's Commentaries on the Law of England' is popularly known for elaborating the '<u>common law</u>.' It is characterized as the 'law about the law' which implies that the text penned by Sir William Blackstone functioned to establish the extensive principles of truth, integrity, and justice.
'<u>Precedent</u>' is characterized as the prior decision or judgment of the court that is used as a citation, analogy, or example to resolve a similar dispute in the future. Thus, it allows in developing better assimilation of the law and take future decisions(in similar cases) by using precedents as the reference.
Answer:
All of above
Explanation: Because the pharaohs could rule over all of them.
Answer: yeah this is a help guide i think cause it does not look like a question to me
Explanation:
