None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
Answer:
Cash recital journals nor even cash statement
Explanation:
to record <em>the </em><em>data </em>
Answer:
Due to intolerance against others religion.
Explanation:
Many Europeans face persecution in the 16th century due to intolerance of people against other religions. Due to this intolerance of religion, many Europeans such as puritans migrated to the new world where they can follow and practice their religion freely. In that century, people of other religion did not follow and practice freely in the Europe due to intolerance of people against religions.
