Sacar arista a un rectangunlo , cuadro y triangulo
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Explained below.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim made by an expert is that driving conditions are dangerous if the variance of speeds exceeds 75 (mph)².
(1)
The hypothesis for both the test can be defined as:
<em>H</em>₀: The variance of speeds does not exceeds 75 (mph)², i.e. <em>σ</em>² ≤ 75.
<em>Hₐ</em>: The variance of speeds exceeds 75 (mph)², i.e. <em>σ</em>² > 75.
(2)
A Chi-square test will be used to perform the test.
The significance level of the test is, <em>α</em> = 0.05.
The degrees of freedom of the test is,
df = n - 1 = 55 - 1 = 54
Compute the critical value as follows:
Decision rule:
If the test statistic value is more than the critical value then the null hypothesis will be rejected and vice-versa.
(3)
Compute the test statistic as follows:
The test statistic value is, 68.184.
Decision:
The null hypothesis will not be rejected at 5% level of significance.
Conclusion:
The variance of speeds does not exceeds 75 (mph)². Thus, concluding that driving conditions are not dangerous on this highway.
Answer:
The inequality required to express the above condition is x ≥ 18.75
Step-by-step explanation:
Renata and her family go through an average of more than 15 cans of sparkling water each day.
The number of cases of 24 cans of sparkling water.
We can take the number of cases to be x.
Each case is said to cost $3.50.
An inequality for the number of cases that Renata's family go through in 24 days can be written as
x ≥ ⇒ x ≥
⇒ x ≥ 18.75
Therefore the inequality required to express the above condition is
x ≥ 18.75