First one goes in the second
<u>Explanation:</u>
Using the Miranda v. Arizona case as an example, we need to remember that M.r Mirinda was charged with sexual assault and kidnapping; which are part of the important issues society tries to avoid
In other words, he went against these important values and goals of society. Hence, there must be a balance between the right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel over breaking other laws in the constitution.
Answer:
There are many answers so ima give one, We can listen and understand the candidates objective by looking at there past, Most would have done charity or giving to people in need. When they were younger they weren't as fortunate and lived like the majority before they became a candidate. This may show if they are trust worthy enough to represent the majority because they understand what its like for people in need.
Explanation:
