The rectangle i would say is a parallelogram. Since a parallelogram has sides that are parallel which explains the name: parallelogram :) :D
we know that
If lines f and g are parallel
then
the angle c must be equal to
∠c= ------> by alternate exterior angles
and
∠c+∠d= ------> by supplementary angles
so
∠d=
therefore
<u>the answer is</u>
The angle d should be equal to to prove that f ∥ g
The first company will double since there is no added value so 29(1)=29 and 29(2)=58, however, the second company won’t double because 100+25(1)=125 but 100+25(2)=150 whereas if it were doubled it would have been 250.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The geometric mean relations for this geometry tell you the length of each segment (x or y) is the root of the product of the hypotenuse segments it touches.
x = √(9×5) = (√9)(√5) = 3√5
y = √(9×(9+5)) = (√9)(√14) = 3√14
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
The geometric mean of 'a' and 'b' is √(ab).
The geometric mean relations derive from the fact that the three triangles in this geometry are similar. That means corresponding sides are proportional.
Segment x is both a long side (of the smallest triangle) and a short side (of the medium-size triangle). Then it will be involved in proportions involving the relationship of the long side and the short side of the triangles it is part of:
long side/short side = x/5 = 9/x
x² = 5·9
x = √(9×5) . . . . as above
In like fashion, y is both a long side and a hypotenuse, so we have ...
long side/hypotenuse = y/(9+5) = 9/y
y² = (9+5)(9)
y = √(9×14) . . . . . as above
The same thing holds true on the other side of the triangle. The unmarked segment is both a short side and a hypotenuse, so its measure will be the geometric mean of 14 and 5, the hypotenuse and its short segment.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
2x + 4x + 180
We have to do combine like terms.
2x and 4x are like terms, so add 2x to 4x. Which gives you 6x. Now you have the expres 6x + 180. You can’t find the variable for this expression, its unsolvable. If you meant, “2x + 4x = 180” Then yes, it would be solvable.
All you would have to do Is, 2x + 4x which gives you 6x, and now divide both side by 6. 6x divided by 6, the two 6 would cancel out, and 180 divide by 6, leaving you with 30. So x should equal to 30.