The correct answer is “Because Hurston uses American English in her novel only occasionally; she clearly feels that her people should be committed to their own language” and “By placing American English and Black English side by side in her novel, Hurston seems to emphasize their nature as separate languages”.
Indeed, Hurston was unconcerned about racial issues and she was criticized by the African American intelligentsia due to that fact. Thus, she is not hostile to white readers, especially considering the fact that the main character is acquitted of murder charges by an all-white, female jury. Also the fact that she conveys all the specific characteristics of Black English does not mean necessarily that she considers it “a language”, Mark Twain did the same with this and several other Southern dialects, both white and black and his intent was only to convey a clear picture of the local vernacular.
Baldwin posits that “because Hurston uses American English in her novel only occasionally, she clearly feels that her people should be committed to their own language”. It is certainly a possible interpretation of her literary choices, in any event she did consider that African Americans had their own distinct identity and such identity is reflected in their vernacular. Finally, it is true that it can be concluded that both Black English and American English are separate linguistic entities from the juxtaposed opposition she operates with the two in her book.
<span>Because your
goal for this essay is to discuss how Shakespeare transformed the original
source, you’ll want to focus, first, on what they both have in common (comparing
similar attributes). Then, you’ll want
to focus on how elements of similarities were changed or how new things
entirely were added or how things may have even been omitted (contrast). This can be done in one of two ways—block or
point by point.
</span>
<span />
<span>If you
format the essay in block format, you’ll first discuss in a paragraph or two
elements selected for discussion in “Pyramus and Thisbe.” Then, after you finish discussing Ovid’s myth,
you’ll discuss, also in a paragraph or two, the elements being
compared/contrasted in Shakespeare’s work.
Be sure to discuss the same points in the same order in block
method. A compare/contrast essay in this
method might resemble the following:</span>
INTRO
PARAGRAPH
BODY PARAGRAPH
– Ovid
Attribute 1
Attribute 2
Attribute 3
BODY
PARAGRAPH – Shakespeare
Attribute 1
Attribute 2
Attribute 3
CONCLUSION
<span>Another
method used when constructing a compare/contrast essay is called point by
point. In this format, you will discuss
elements of both works within the same paragraph and do so point by point. An essay constructed in this manner might
resemble the following: </span>
INTRODUCTION
PARAGRAPH
Attribute
from Ovid
Same attribute
from Shakespeare
PARAGRAPH
Attribute
from Ovid
Same attribute
from Shakespeare
PARAGRAPH
Attribute
from Ovid
Same attribute
from Shakespeare
CONCLUSION
<span>In this type
for format, be sure to always discuss the same work first. Thus, Ovid should always be mentioned first,
then you’ll follow that up with a discussion of Shakespeare because, after all,
you are supposed to be discussing how Shakespeare changed things, and this
would make the most sense. Point by
point would probably be the most efficient manner in which to highlight the
transformations made by Shakespeare since it would keep both elements fresh
within the mind/eye of the reader.</span>
Answer:
Praise the puppy or give it a treat
Explanation:
You wouldn't want to punish it for doing something good
Your answer rounded to a tenth is 43.6 as 8 is closer to ten than zero so it would be like 43.5+0.1=43.6
number line
43, 43.1, 43.2, 43.3 ,43.4, 43.5, 43.6 so on
<span>Elizabeth Proctor was accused of witchcraft because Mercy Lewis and Abigail Williams claimed Elizabeth Proctor visited them at night in spirit form and tormented them.</span>
