Answer:
A market for cats would have had a positive externality.
Because the cats would kill the rats on sight since that is their natural behavior.
However, it is interesting to mention, that the cat's killing has been more of a "mythic" aspect of this story, since it fails to take into account that since the black death was caused by the<em> yersinia pestis</em> bacteria, cats could have been also infected, and since their interactions with humans are greater than rats or fleas, the real outcome could have been totally unexpected.
The answer would be that stress rises from both the occurrences and our cognitive appraisal of them. Cognitive appraisal means that it is the personal understanding of a condition that eventually influences the degree to which the situation is professed as stressful.
They are used during a parliamentary procedure. They mean I vote in favor or I vote against.
Answer:
"Helping elected officials who belong to the party work together more effectively."
Explanation:
sorry found this, and ur questions been up awhile. sorry
<span>In contrast with correlational research, experimental research allows cause-and-effect conclusions. This is because experimental research limits the number of independent variables to one variable, so we know that the independent variable has an effect on the dependent variable. In correlational research the independent variable is not limited to one, so while we know there is a correlation between the independent and dependent variable, we don't know that it caused it. An example is that on a rainy day we see a people carrying umbrellas. However, the correlation between people carrying umbrellas and the rain does not mean the people carrying the umbrellas caused the rain.</span>
