Answer:
A good is non-rival in consumption if one person's use of the good does not preclude consumption by others.
Explanation:
A good is non-rival in consumption if one person's use of the good does not preclude consumption by others. Rivalry is a term used in economics. When a good is rival it means that its consumption deprives or reduces the possibility of others consuming it. In general non rival goods are intangible. For example, the internet. When a person uses the internet, it doesn't reduce the possibility of others using it. However, a domain, although intangible, it is rival because once it's taken it cannot be used by someone else.
The use of politically charged message and fast moving images indicate that the executive is making use of <u>distractions</u> to suppress counterarguments.
<h3>What is a counterargument?</h3>
It should be noted that counterargument simply means an argument that goes against a thesis and expresses a different point of view.
In this case, the fact that the created an advertisement that used both a politically charged message and fast moving images is a form of distraction. This is important to subdue the counterargument.
Learn more about counterargument on:
brainly.com/question/1198856
He was democratic republican, which generally keep a strict interpretation of the constitution while federal it's prefer a loose interpretation
Answer:
When Nazi Germany openly started re-armament in 1935, few should have been surprised as Hitler had made it very clear both in his speeches and in “Mein Kampf” that he would break the “unjust” terms of the Treaty of Versailles.
Explanation:
Hitler saw Nazi Germany as being at the centre of Europe and as the great power of Europe, the nation needed a strong military. Throughout the 1920’s, Germany had been technically keeping to the terms of the Treaty of Versailles but in reality she had been bending the rules regarding training. Versialles had not stated that Germany could not train submarine crews abroad or that pilots for the banned German Air Force could train on civilian planes. Therefore, on paper Hitler inherited a weak military but this was not in reality the case. However, Hitler knew that publicly Nazi Germany was still seen within Europe as being held to the terms of Versailles and he was determined to openly break these terms and re-assert Germany’s right to control its own military.
hope this help plz mark branly if it does :P
