A,B,C,D I'm pretty sure, but check with others who answer the question too.
There would be a much more severe cause of global warming if there is a sudden increase in greenhouses gases. With greenhouse gasses such as carbon dioxide, the heat of the earth cannot be penetrated through the atmosphere and will be trapped, the sunlight also cannot be reflected.
<u><em>Answer:</em></u>
<u><em>Combustion</em></u>
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
<u><em>The step in the carbon cycle didn’t really exist before the industrial revolution was Combustion</em></u>
<u><em /></u>
<u><em>please mark me brainliest <3</em></u>
The answer to this question would be: the more force used, the less effective it is.
Sometimes, more force in counterinsurgency can cause a less effectivity. It was called paradox because with more force you should expect more results and more efficiency. But more force could mean higher possibility for collateral damage which can cause loss, not gain. An overwhelming force also might be pictured as brutality.
