1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Thepotemich [5.8K]
2 years ago
14

How did the pact benefit Muslims and non-Muslims at this time in history?

History
1 answer:
Vinil7 [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The Pact of Umar (also known as the Covenant of Umar, Treaty of Umar or Laws of Umar; Arabic: شروط عمر‎ or عهد عمر or عقد عمر), is an apocryphal treaty between the Muslims and the Christians of either Syria, Mesopotamia,[1] or Jerusalem[2] that later gained a canonical status in Islamic jurisprudence. It specifies rights and restrictions for non-Muslims (dhimmis, or "people of the book," a type of protected class of peoples recognized by Islam including Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, and several other recognized faiths[3]) living under Islamic rule.

Explanation: Brainliest Please?

You might be interested in
How did the spanish american war impact relations between north and south
Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

The USA annexed the former Spanish colonies of Puerto Rico, the Philippines, and Guam. The war gave both sides a common enemy for the first time since the end of the American Civil War in 1865, and many friendships would have been formed between soldiers of both Northern and Southern states during their tour of duty.

6 0
3 years ago
Which term refers to a behavior followed by an unpleasant consequence
Annette [7]
Refers to a punishment.
3 0
3 years ago
Write a paragraph that supports or refutes this
Lorico [155]

Answer:

Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Why was Cornwallis not able to get the reinforcements that he was expecting?
Fofino [41]

its the first one so a

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. Why did Europeans embark on the Crusades?
OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

because of Religious reasons,  hope to win wealth and land. crusaders hoped to escape trouble at home, others yearned for adventure

Explanati

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which U.S. president began the unwritten two-term rule?
    8·2 answers
  • What were the weaknesses apparent in American society in the late 1800s
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the officers drill the soldiers were sick of it. help
    7·2 answers
  • Who was the president in Russia 1876
    12·1 answer
  • Who was lieutenant colonel george armstrong custer ? what all did he accomplish ?
    11·1 answer
  • True or False: Slaves were not an economical long-term investment for West Indies planters.
    7·1 answer
  • Labor unions were groups that sought to improve working conditions for laborers.
    5·1 answer
  • What is the most immediate) goal of nonviolent resistance?
    6·1 answer
  • 1. What did Washington believe was a danger to the U.S. political system? (need 2)
    6·1 answer
  • Why is much of the ethnic conflict in Africa today considered a legacy of the colonial era?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!