Answer: C. . I and III
Explanation:
Scarcity occurs when our want and the needs are more than the available resources that we have. In this case, we will then have to make a choice to be able to choose from the different alternatives that we have.
When we make a choice, the cost of the other alternative that we left is refered to as the opportunity cost. Therefore, the correct options are:
• The "highest-valued alternative given up to get something" is the opportunity cost.
• Scarcity creates opportunity costs
The statement that wealthy economies don't experience opportunity costs is wrong. Every nation experiences opportunity cost.
Railroad, barbed wire and the modern water pump
Answer:
To an important extent it is true that World War II was motivated by revenge, at least in Europe.
Explanation:
Germany, the main country that caused the war, had lost World War I just two decades earlier, and that loss meant the annexation of several of its former lands by neighboring countries, and the imposition of very expensive war reparation payments, that led to many economic problems in the country.
Many Germans were angry at their situation, and Hitler took advantage of this to sell the idea of revenge, but also of outright destruction.
The DHS incorporates several dozen offices and agencies, many of them previously assigned to other departments and some entirely new. They include the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), U.S. Secret Service (USSS), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), and the newly created Transportation Security Administration (TSA).
Answer:
speculation.
Explanation:
Democritus was a pre-Socratic philosopher. Like all philosophers who share this label, they mostly engaged in a kind of thought governed by speculation in search of governing doctrines, in specific a peculiar form of speculation, that is to say, a kind of informed and well-reasoned imaginative effort based on no empirical or demonstrable principles. One such speculative doctrine is his theory of atoms which holds great resemblance with the modern day conception of atoms that we have today, though they are based on extremely different arguments and, in the case of the Greek philosopher, no observable phenomena.
