1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga2289 [7]
3 years ago
15

How do I end my subscription

Law
1 answer:
Mazyrski [523]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Just delete the app

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which executive department do you think is the most important and why?
Nikitich [7]

Answer:

The Department of Defense

Explanation:

Because it is in charge of our military which protects our country's freedoms.

4 0
3 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS ON THE LINE!!!!
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

This article shall take effect two years after the date of ratification. ... Women are still disproportionately poor, suffer from widespread ... opposed equal pay laws and minimum wage increase measures, opposed paid sick

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Driver _______ are strongly held beliefs, morals or ethical philosophies.
katrin [286]
Answer: Values

Explanation: Driver beliefs are the same thing as driver values, since beliefs and values hold the same meaning as they are “strongly held beliefs, morals or ethic philosophies”.

Hope this helps! Sorry if it is wrong!
6 0
1 year ago
Did OJ Simpson commit the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman? Justify your answer by using compelling evidence from
dlinn [17]

Explanation:

The matching bloody gloves found at the murder scene and outside Simpson's home

9:36 P.M. Simpson, wearing a dark sweat suit, is seen by Kato Kaelin.

9:30-9:45 Charles Cale, walking his dog by Simpson's Rockingham residence, does not see Bronco.

10:02 Simpson attempts to call Paula Barbieri on the cell phone from his Bronco.

10:15 (prosecution)-10:40 (defense) Period during which murders took place.

10:22-10:30 Limo driver Allan Park, scheduled to take Simpson to airport, does not see Bronco on Rockingham.

10:40, 10:43, 10:49 Allan Park buzzes Simpson's intercom, but gets no response.

10:50 White or light bronco observed at the intersection of Bundy and Dorothy.

10:51 or 10:52 Kato Kaelin hears three thumps on the wall outside his room.

10:54 Allan Park sees a man wearing dark clothes, about 6-feet tall and 200 pounds, walk across the driveway of the Simpson residence.

10:55 Simpson lies to Allan Park.

1. The 9-1-1 call and the history of Simpson's violence directed at Nicole Brown.

2. Hair evidence: (1) hairs consistent with that of Simpson found on cap at Bundy residence, (2) hairs consistent with that of Simpson found on Ron Goldman's shirt.

3. Fiber evidence: (1) cotton fibers consistent with the carpet in the Bronco found on glove at Rockingham, (2) fibers consistent with the carpet from the Bronco found on cap at Bundy residence.

4. Blood evidence: (1) killer dropped blood near shoe prints at Bundy, (2) blood dropped at Bundy was of same type as Simpson's (about 0.5% of population would match), (3) Simpson had fresh cuts on left hand on day after murder, (4) blood found in Bronco, (5) blood found in foyer and master bedroom of Simpson home, (5) blood found on Simpson's driveway, (6) blood on socks in OJ's home matched Nicole's.

5. Glove evidence: (1) left glove found at Bundy and right glove found at Simpson residence are Aris Light gloves, size XL, (2) Nicole Brown bought pair of Aris Light XL gloves in 1990 at Bloomingdale's, (3) Simpson wore Aris Light gloves from 1990 to June, 1994.

6. Shoe evidence: (1) shoe prints found at Bundy were from a size 12 Bruno Magli shoe, (2) bloody shoe impression on Bronco carpet is consistent with a Magli shoe, (3) Simpson wore a size 12 shoe.

7. Other evidence: (1) flight in Bronco, (2) strange reaction to phone call informing him of Nicole Brown's death, etc.

1. Simpson did not testify at his criminal trial. Defense attorneys will almost always call as a witness an articulate client that they believe to be innocent.

2. Subsequent to the trial defense attorneys talking about the trial have been careful to say "the jury did the right thing," while not stating that Simpson was in fact innocent.

3. Subsequent to the trial, Simpson has devoted no real effort to tracking down the "real killer," nor has any significant evidence surfaced suggesting that the killer was anyone other than Simpson.

4. The jury was not allowed to hear testimony concerning Simpson's rumored jailhouse confession to Rosie Grier.

5. Subsequent to the criminal trial other evidence of Simpson's guilt surfaced. The most significant of the new evidence may have been photographs of Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes. The new evidence, together with much of the evidence considered in the criminal trial, convinced a civil jury that Simpson murdered Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman.

6. In his 2007 book, If I Did It, Simpson (for all intents and purposes) confessed. The book describes in detail events leading up to the moment of the murders

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Các bộ luật điển hình kiểu pháp luật tư sản là gì ?
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

Pháp luật tư sản tồn tại dưới ba hình thức là pháp luật tập quán, pháp luật án lệ và văn bản quy phạm pháp luật (pháp luật thành văn).

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 6. Who constitutes the collective body of the Joint Chiefs of Staff? (1 point)
    14·2 answers
  • why does the police hide at night time for is it because they sleep on the job or what please explain
    9·1 answer
  • Why do you have to be 18 or older, in most states, to drive?
    5·2 answers
  • 7. What is the primary purpose of a statute?
    13·1 answer
  • What is one thing that you believe the legal system does well?
    13·1 answer
  • Gvfldccfklddfñdfvdfñdfñbggkmfdvdboivbc
    14·1 answer
  • Describe TWO ways in which the above law protects citizens against human right violations​
    6·2 answers
  • What does 'distributive justice' mean in philosophy?.
    6·1 answer
  • How to conduct a disciplinary hearing
    11·1 answer
  • courts normally follow the rule of stare decisis when deciding cases. there are times, however, as in state v. witt, a new jerse
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!